Literature DB >> 12194804

Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy.

Peter E Clark1.   

Abstract

At most centers with experience in urinary diversion, an orthotopic urinary reservoir is the diversion of choice after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. The paradigm has shifted in the past 10 years from actively looking for reasons to do an orthotopic diversion to carefully considering why a patient cannot undergo reconstruction to their native urethra. In our institution, any patient who is to undergo a radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is a potential candidate for orthotopic diversion provided they do not have chronic renal insufficiency. In addition, they must have a negative urethral margin on frozen section at the time of cystectomy, and have the mental and physical capacity to understand what is required to manage the reservoir after surgery. Proper patient selection is the key to success. Notably, chronologic age is not an absolute contraindication to orthotopic diversion. Instead, careful consideration of the patient's comorbid conditions should guide eligibility. In addition, locally advanced disease is not a contraindication to an orthotopic diversion. To have the flexibility to manage whatever situation presents itself intraoperatively, the surgeon performing a urinary diversion after radical cystectomy must be facile with several diversion techniques. At the very least, the surgeon must be comfortable with one type of each major form of urinary diversion, a conduit (incontinent) diversion, a continent cutaneous diversion, and an orthotopic diversion. As a result, radical cystectomy and urinary diversion should be performed at centers with significant experience in all three types of diversions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194804     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-002-0004-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  38 in total

1.  The female urethral sphincter: a morphological and topographical study.

Authors:  K Colleselli; A Stenzl; R Eder; H Strasser; S Poisel; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Does the option of the ileal neobladder stimulate patient and physician decision toward earlier cystectomy?

Authors:  R E Hautmann; T Paiss
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The orthotopic Kock ileal neobladder: functional results, urodynamic features, complications and survival in 166 men.

Authors:  K Steven; A L Poulsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The type of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy significantly impacts on the patient's quality of life.

Authors:  M S McGuire; G Grimaldi; J Grotas; P Russo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Urethral recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Predictive value of preoperative latero-montanal biopsies and urethral frozen sections during prostatocystectomy.

Authors:  T Lebret; J M Hervé; P Barré; F Gaudez; P M Lugagne; M Barbagelatta; H Botto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Functional results of orthotopic ileal neobladder with serous-lined extramural ureteral reimplantation: experience with 450 patients.

Authors:  H Abol-Enein; M A Ghoneim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 2 cases.

Authors:  I S Gill; A Fergany; E A Klein; J H Kaouk; G T Sung; A M Meraney; S J Savage; J C Ulchaker; A C Novick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Comparison of studer ileal neobladder and ileal conduit urinary diversion with respect to perioperative outcome and late complications.

Authors:  B M Gburek; M M Lieber; M L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Summary of 10 years' experience with an ileal low-pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment.

Authors:  U E Studer; H Danuser; W Hochreiter; J P Springer; W H Turner; E J Zingg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup.

Authors:  R E Hautmann; R de Petriconi; H W Gottfried; K Kleinschmidt; R Mattes; T Paiss
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Determining when to recommend continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; James E Montie
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Involving Patients in the Development and Evaluation of an Educational and Training Experiential Intervention (ETEI) to Improve Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treatment Decision-making and Post-operative Self-care: a Mixed Methods Approach.

Authors:  Nihal Mohamed; Tung Ming Leung; Qainat N Shah; Sailaja Pisipati; Donna L Berry; Emma K T Benn; Cheryl T Lee; Simon Hall; Reza Mehrazin; John Sfakianos
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Socioeconomic status is associated with urinary diversion utilization after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Simon P Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Muscle invasive bladder cancer: from diagnosis to survivorship.

Authors:  N E Mohamed; M A Diefenbach; H H Goltz; C T Lee; D Latini; M Kowalkowski; C Philips; W Hassan; S J Hall
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-08-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.