Literature DB >> 9519322

Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation. A prospective study.

A V Mattioli1, D Vivoli, G Mattioli.   

Abstract

AIM: Many studies suggest that patients who receive a physiological pacemaker have a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation compared to patients receiving a ventricular pacemaker.
METHODS: In order to evaluate the impact of different pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation, we prospectively analysed 210 patients. Patients with previous episodes of atrial fibrillation were excluded from the study. The patient population included 110 patients paced for sick sinus syndrome and 100 patients paced for total atrioventricular block or second degree type atrioventricular block.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for 5 years; the incidence of atrial fibrillation was 10% at 1 year, 23% at 3 years and 31% at 5 years. There was an increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients receiving a ventricular pacemaker compared to patients receiving a physiological pacemaker.
CONCLUSION: The pacing modality appeared to influence the incidence of atrial fibrillation in paced patients; patients with ventricular pacing had a significantly higher incidence of arrhythmias than did patients with physiological pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519322     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  14 in total

1.  Physiologic pacing: where pacing mode selection reflects the indication.

Authors:  J S Healey; E Crystal; S J Connolly
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  [Guidelines for heart pacemaker therapy].

Authors:  B Lemke; B Nowak; D Pfeiffer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-10

3.  Dual site right atrial pacing in the prevention of symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory to drug therapy and unrelated to sinus bradycardia.

Authors:  Roberto Boccadamo; Natale Di Belardino; Agostino Mammucari; Valentina Boccadamo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Is dual defibrillator better than conventional DDD pacing in brady-tachy syndrome? Results of the ICARUS Trial (Internal Cardioversion Antitachypacing and Prevention: Resource Utilization Study).

Authors:  Massimo Santini; Renato Ricci; Carlo Pignalberi; Maurizio Russo; Barbara Magris; Nicoletta Grovale; Tiziana De Santo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Cardiac Pacing for Bradycardia Support: Evidence-based Approach to Pacemaker Selection and Programming.

Authors:  Israel Galtes; Gervasio A. Lamas
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-10

Review 6.  Clinical trials of pacing for maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Anne M Gillis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field.

Authors:  Stanley Nattel; Paul Khairy; Denis Roy; Bernard Thibault; Peter Guerra; Mario Talajic; Marc Dubuc
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Prevention of and medical therapy for atrial arrhythmias in heart failure.

Authors:  A U Khand; J G F Cleland; P C Deedwania
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Determination of myocardial energetic output for cardiac rhythm pacing.

Authors:  Dalibor Herman; Svetlana Prevorovská; Frantisek Marsík
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2007-12

Review 10.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.