Literature DB >> 9516625

Nonurgent use of the pediatric emergency department during the day.

N M Kini1, R T Strait.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern and reasons for nonurgent use of the pediatric emergency department (PED) during regular office hours and why primary care physicians (PCP) approve such visits.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study.
SETTING: Free-standing, university-affiliated children's hospital emergency department. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the PED and triaged as nonurgent between June and November 1994, Monday through Friday from 6:30 am to 6:30 pm, and Saturday 6:30 am to 12:00 noon. MEASUREMENTS: Registration and triage information and all communication with the PCP.
RESULTS: Of 1020 eligible patients, 364 patients and their PCP completed the study. Fifty-two percent of the study patients were enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO). This is consistent with the penetration of managed care in this community. Most HMO (118 of 191, 62%) and non-HMO enrollees (147 of 173, 86%) did not call their PCP prior to arrival in the PED. Comparing the reasons given by these patients (HMO enrollees versus non-HMO) for not calling, we found: convenience (HMO 17% vs non-HMO 4%, P < 0.01), "no identified PCP" (HMO 17% vs non-HMO 42%, P < 0.01), and "felt problem was an emergency" (HMO 19% vs non-HMO 10%, P = 0.03) to be important differences. HMO enrollees received approval for the visit 79% of the time. These approvals were mostly after noon, whereas most denials occurred before noon. We found a pattern in the reason for approvals. Before 3:30 pm, the most common reason was that the PCP "considered the problem medically urgent" (48 out of 106). After 3:30 pm, without significant difference in the pattern of patient's chief complaints, there was a dramatic change to "a full office schedule" (25 out of 45) as the most common reason.
CONCLUSION: Communication between the patient and PCP prior to the PED visit is poor in the study population. Convenience and physician workload appear to be important factors in the choice to use the PED for nonurgent problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9516625     DOI: 10.1097/00006565-199802000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  7 in total

1.  Community- versus individual-level indicators to identify pediatric health care need.

Authors:  Cheryl Zlotnick
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Care-giving and care-seeking behaviours of parents who take their children to an emergency department for non-urgent care.

Authors:  Corrine D Truman; Linda Reutter
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

3.  A Time-and-Motion Study of Clinical Trial Eligibility Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Huaxiu Tang; Andrea Kachelmeyer; Melanie Hounchell; Stephanie Kennebeck; Imre Solti; Yizhao Ni
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.454

4.  The impact of insurance lapse among low-income children.

Authors:  Cheryl Zlotnick; Laurie A Soman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 5.  Cost reduction strategies for emergency services: insurance role, practice changes and patients accountability.

Authors:  Daniel Simonet
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2008-02-28

6.  Why Do Parents Bring Their Children to the Emergency Department? A Systematic Inventory of Motives.

Authors:  Anne Costet Wong; Isabelle Claudet; Paul Sorum; Etienne Mullet
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2015-11-04

7.  Need for intervention in families presenting to the emergency department with multiple children as patients.

Authors:  Jesus Lemus; Melissa Chacko; Ilene Claudius
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.