Literature DB >> 9516151

Plasmablastic morphology--an independent prognostic factor with clinical and laboratory correlates: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) myeloma trial E9486 report by the ECOG Myeloma Laboratory Group.

P R Greipp1, T Leong, J M Bennett, J P Gaillard, B Klein, J A Stewart, M M Oken, N E Kay, B Van Ness, R A Kyle.   

Abstract

We studied the prognostic significance of plasmablastic (PB) multiple myeloma (MM) in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III trial E9486. Two reviewers independently reviewed 453 cases. They agreed on 37 PB (8.2%) cases and 416 non-PB cases, achieving an 85% concordance (P < .0001). These PB cases had significantly lower hemoglobin and serum albumin levels, higher calcium and beta 2-microglobuin levels, and higher percentage BM plasma cells (PC) by immunofluorescence. They had higher bone marrow PC labeling indices, higher serum soluble interleukin-6 receptor (sIL-6R) levels, and a higher probability of ras mutations. Three treatment regimens were used: vincristine, bis-chloro-ethyl nitrosourea (BCNU) melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP) alone; VBMCP with added cyclophosphamide (HiCy); or recombinant interferon alpha 2 (rIFNalpha2). Although the numbers are low, patients with PB had a significantly lower response rate versus non-PB MM when treated with VBMCP (treated, 47.1% v nontreated, 66.5% [P = .015]). Patients with nonresponding PB had a significantly higher progression rate than non-PB cases (30.6% v 11.8% [P < .0001]), especially with VBMCP alone (35.3% v 15.8% [P = .002]), and with added HiCy (37.5% v 9.8% [P < .0001]), but not with added rIFNalpha2. Event-free and overall survival of PB MM was shorter (median years, 1.1 v 2.7 and 1.9 v 3.7, respectively [P < .0001 for both]). In multivariate analysis, PB classification was also highly prognostic. There is no survival difference between the patients who were classified as PB by both reviewers versus patients classified as PB by only one reviewer. We conclude that PB MM is a discrete entity associated with more aggressive disease and shortened survival. Tumor cell ras mutations and increased sIL-6R may contribute to a higher proliferation rate and reduced survival. There were significant improvements in response and progression with the addition of HiCy and rIFNalpha2 to VBMCP, but the numbers were small and improved survival could not be shown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9516151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  27 in total

1.  Optimizing the use of anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody with dexamethasone and 140 mg/m2 of melphalan in multiple myeloma: results of a pilot study including biological aspects.

Authors:  J-F Rossi; N Fegueux; Z Y Lu; E Legouffe; C Exbrayat; M-C Bozonnat; R Navarro; E Lopez; P Quittet; J-P Daures; V Rouillé; T Kanouni; J Widjenes; B Klein
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  DNA repair pathways in human multiple myeloma: role in oncogenesis and potential targets for treatment.

Authors:  Claire Gourzones-Dmitriev; Alboukadel Kassambara; Surinder Sahota; Thierry Rème; Jérôme Moreaux; Pascal Bourquard; Dirk Hose; Philippe Pasero; Angelos Constantinou; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Lenalidomide maintenance for high-risk multiple myeloma after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Alsina; Pamela S Becker; Xiaobo Zhong; Alexia Adams; Parameswaran Hari; Scott Rowley; Edward A Stadtmauer; David H Vesole; Brent Logan; Daniel Weisdorf; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Leslie L Popplewell; Brian McClune; William Bensinger; Marcie Riches; Sergio A Giralt; Marcelo C Pasquini
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pleural effusion-based nomogram to predict outcomes in unselected patients with multiple myeloma: a large single center experience.

Authors:  Zi-Liang Hou; Yu Kang; Guang-Zhong Yang; Zhen Wang; Feng Wang; Yan-Xia Yu; Wen-Ming Chen; Huan-Zhong Shi
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  The colorful landscape of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Eli Muchtar; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-02-27

Review 7.  Plasma cell myeloma: role of histopathology, immunophenotyping, and genetic testing.

Authors:  Megan J Fitzpatrick; Valentina Nardi; Aliyah R Sohani
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization data with ISS staging improves risk assessment in myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group collaborative project.

Authors:  H Avet-Loiseau; B G M Durie; M Cavo; M Attal; N Gutierrez; J Haessler; H Goldschmidt; R Hajek; J H Lee; O Sezer; B Barlogie; J Crowley; R Fonseca; N Testoni; F Ross; S V Rajkumar; P Sonneveld; J Lahuerta; P Moreau; G Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Use of melphalan, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in treatment of refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gordan Srkalovic; Paul Elson; Beth Trebisky; Mary Ann Karam; Mohamad A Hussein
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Aggressive plasmablastic multiple myeloma in a 42-year-old: is inflammatory bowel disease or infliximab treatment to be blamed?

Authors:  Siddhartha Yadav; Ramesh Kumar; Ishmael A Jaiyesimi; Mohammad Muhsin Chisti
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.