Literature DB >> 9515862

Effects of sampling interval on peak oxygen consumption in patients evaluated for heart transplantation.

J S Johnson1, J J Carlson, R L VanderLaan, D E Langholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Peak oxygen consumption is a commonly accepted criterion in patient selection for cardiac transplantation. To determine the effect of various gas exchange sampling intervals on the variability of peak oxygen consumption, 15 consecutive patients evaluated for cardiac transplantation performed maximal treadmill testing using a ramped protocol. Oxygen consumption was measured via breath-by-breath analysis of expired air. Peak oxygen consumption was determined for each test using the following sampling intervals: 60-, 30-, and 15-s averages, eight breath rolling average, and true breath by breath. Variability of the mean peak oxygen consumption for each sample average was compared using analysis of variance on repeated measures. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Measures of peak oxygen consumption differed significantly (p<0.001) between sampling averages. A maximum variability of 20% was noted between the largest and smallest averages (13.8+/-4.2 mL/kg/min for 60 s vs 17.3+/-4.2 mL/kg/min for breath by breath). No significant difference was found between the 30-s, 15-s, and eight breath rolling averages (14.2+/-3.7 vs 14.5+/-3.9 vs 14.7+/-4.3 mL/kg/min), respectively. Results of the study suggest (1) the sampling average can have a significant effect on peak oxygen consumption influencing patient selection for transplantation, and (2) sample averages larger than breath by breath but smaller than 60 s be used for determination of peak oxygen consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9515862     DOI: 10.1378/chest.113.3.816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  4 in total

1.  Effect of sampling strategy on measures of VO2peak obtained using commercial breath-by-breath systems.

Authors:  David W Hill; Lindsay P Stephens; Sonja A Blumoff-Ross; David C Poole; Jimmy C Smith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-05-17       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Performance predicting factors in prolonged exhausting exercise of varying intensity.

Authors:  Glenn Björklund; Sofia Pettersson; Erika Schagatay
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Exercise limitations in a competitive cyclist twelve months post heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jeremy A Patterson; Nicolas G Walton
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Cardiovascular exercise and burden of arrhythmia in patients with atrial fibrillation - A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ane Katrine Skielboe; Thomas Quaade Bandholm; Stine Hakmann; Malene Mourier; Thomas Kallemose; Ulrik Dixen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.