Literature DB >> 9515646

Nurses' responses to severity dependent errors: a study of the causal attributions made by nurses following an error.

C E Meurier1, C A Vincent, D G Parmar.   

Abstract

Attribution theory attempts to understand how people explain events and their own role in them, particularly events which are unusual or unpleasant. Based on previous studies on attributions, it was suggested that nurses would make more external attributions (i.e. blaming others or the environment) following an error with a serious outcome than one with a non-serious outcome. This would in turn suggest that they might be less likely to respond constructively and learn from serious errors. Sixty nurses were approached for this study. They were divided into two groups. One group (30 subjects) completed a questionnaire on the responses to a description of an error with a non-serious outcome and the second group (also 30 subjects) responded to questions to an identical error but with a serious outcome. The findings from this study indicated that nurses behaved in an atypical manner in response to making an error. Although both groups of nurses tended to make slightly more internal attributions for the error, indicating that they are likely to take responsibility for their error, those nurses in the serious outcome condition blamed themselves more for the error. This may be due to the strong professional ethos which exists amongst nurses that expects them to take responsibility for their actions. This would inevitably include any error that they may make in the course of giving care. The conclusion that can be drawn is that nurses might be quite receptive to making constructive changes in their practice following an error, provided this situation is managed properly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9515646     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00512.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

1.  A cross sectional research on the height, weight and body mass index of children aged 5-6 years in Latvia and its secular changes during the last century.

Authors:  Helena Karkliņa; Dzanna Krumina; Inguna Ebela; Janis Valeinis; Gundega Knipse
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.163

2.  Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: the role of outcome and relationship with the care provider.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawton; Peter Gardner; Rachel Plachcinski
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The aftermath of adverse events in Spanish primary care and hospital health professionals.

Authors:  José Joaquín Mira; Irene Carrillo; Susana Lorenzo; Lena Ferrús; Carmen Silvestre; Pastora Pérez-Pérez; Guadalupe Olivera; Fuencisla Iglesias; Elena Zavala; José Ángel Maderuelo-Fernández; Julián Vitaller; Roberto Nuño-Solinís; Pilar Astier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Psychological impact and recovery after involvement in a patient safety incident: a repeated measures analysis.

Authors:  Eva Van Gerven; Luk Bruyneel; Massimiliano Panella; Martin Euwema; Walter Sermeus; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Complications: acknowledging, managing, and coping with human error.

Authors:  Sevann Helo; Carol-Anne E Moulton
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.