Literature DB >> 9515545

Subtraction ictal SPET co-registered to MRI in partial epilepsy: description and technical validation of the method with phantom and patient studies.

T J O'Brien1, M K O'Connor, B P Mullan, B H Brinkmann, D Hanson, C R Jack, E L So.   

Abstract

Computer-aided subtraction of the co-registered and normalized interictal from the ictal single photon emission tomography (SPET) scan, followed by co-registration to the magnetic resonance image, may improve the utility of ictal SPET in the localization of partial epilepsy. This paper describes and technically validates our method. The SPET to SPET co-registration was tested using six sequential 99Tc(m) brain phantom SPET images of different known positions (15 matches). The registration error was determined by multiplying the calculated match transformation matrix by the inverse of the known transformation matrix. The 'worst case' co-registration error was less that one voxel diameter in all cases (median 3.2 mm, range 1.2-4.8 mm). For interictal to ictal SPET registrations in 10 consecutive intractable partial epilepsy patients, a similar root mean square distance (RMSD) between corresponding points on the matched scans was found as for the phantom studies (median 2.2 vs 2.6 mm). The appropriateness of our normalization was studied by comparing the pixel intensity distributions between the matched scans, and by analysing the subtraction pixel intensity distribution. The pixel intensity distribution for both the normalized phantom, and paired normalized patient studies, were closely matched to each other except for the extreme values, which in clinical situations likely represent regions of ictal activation or depression. The subtraction image intensity distributions were symmetrically centred on zero for all values up to at least within the 5th to 95th centile range, confirming good normalization for the 'non-activated' pixels. Also, a linear relationship was demonstrated between the measured pixel intensity on the phantom scans and the true changes in 99Tc(m) activity based on its decay constant. The results of this study demonstrate that our method produces accurate SPET to SPET co-registration, and appropriate SPET normalization, thereby allowing a valid ictal subtraction image to be derived.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9515545     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-199801000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  30 in total

1.  SPECT imaging of the stomach: comparison with barostat, and effects of sex, age, body mass index, and fundoplication. Single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  E P Bouras; S Delgado-Aros; M Camilleri; E J Castillo; D D Burton; G M Thomforde; H J Chial
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Neuroimaging of epilepsy.

Authors:  Fernando Cendes; William H Theodore; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Vlastimil Sulc; Gregory D Cascino
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2016

3.  Required time delay from 99mTc-HMPAO injection to SPECT data acquisition: healthy subjects and patients with rCBF pattern.

Authors:  Gerda Thomsen; Robin de Nijs; Esben Hogh-Rasmussen; Vibe Frokjaer; Claus Svarer; Gitte M Knudsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Neuroimaging characteristics of MRI-negative orbitofrontal epilepsy with focus on voxel-based morphometric MRI postprocessing.

Authors:  Aleksandar J Ristic; Z Irene Wang; Chong H Wong; Stephen E Jones; Imad M Najm; Felix Schneider; Shuang Wang; Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez; W Bingaman; Andreas V Alexopoulos
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.864

5.  Brain areas involved in medial temporal lobe seizures: a principal component analysis of ictal SPECT data.

Authors:  Bruno J Weder; Kaspar Schindler; Thomas J Loher; Roland Wiest; Michael Wissmeyer; Peter Ritter; Karl Lovblad; Filippo Donati; John Missimer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Linking MRI postprocessing with magnetic source imaging in MRI-negative epilepsy.

Authors:  Zhong I Wang; Andreas V Alexopoulos; Stephen E Jones; Imad M Najm; Aleksandar Ristic; Chong Wong; Richard Prayson; Felix Schneider; Yosuke Kakisaka; Shuang Wang; William Bingaman; Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez; Richard C Burgess
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Intracranial electroencephalography seizure onset patterns and surgical outcomes in nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy.

Authors:  Nicholas M Wetjen; W Richard Marsh; Fredric B Meyer; Gregory D Cascino; Elson So; Jeffrey W Britton; S Matthew Stead; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Seizure Freedom in Children With Pathology-Confirmed Focal Cortical Dysplasia.

Authors:  Anna Mrelashvili; Robert J Witte; Elaine C Wirrell; Katherine C Nickels; Lily C Wong-Kisiel
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  FocusDET, a new toolbox for SISCOM analysis. Evaluation of the registration accuracy using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Berta Martí Fuster; Oscar Esteban; Xavier Planes; Pablo Aguiar; Cristina Crespo; Carles Falcon; Gert Wollny; Sebastià Rubí Sureda; Xavier Setoain; Alejandro F Frangi; Maria J Ledesma; Andrés Santos; Javier Pavía; Domènec Ros
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-01

10.  Epilepsy: The future scenario.

Authors:  H V Srinivas
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.