Literature DB >> 9514446

Comparison of different echocardiographic methods with radionuclide imaging for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction during acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolytic therapy.

K Jensen-Urstad1, F Bouvier, J Höjer, H Ruiz, J Hulting, B Samad, C Thorstrand, M Jensen-Urstad.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to: (1) compare the usefulness, in clinical practice, of different echocardiographic methods of left ventricular (LV) function determination in patients with a recent thrombolytic-treated acute myocardial infarction (AMI); (2) compare these measurements with the reference method radionuclide imaging; and (3) evaluate the reproducibility of visual estimation of the LV ejection fraction (EF) and the use of the biplane method of discs (Simpson's rule) in clinical practice. Echocardiography and radionuclide imaging were performed within 2 hours of each another, 5 to 8 days after hospital admission. Ninety-six patients (70 men and 26 women) age 64 +/- 9 years (range 45 to 75) were studied. The echocardiographic study was performed by 2 experienced physicians, independently of each another. LV wall motion score index and visual estimation of the EF correlated best with the radionuclide EF (r = 0.72 and r = 0.71), thereafter simply counting the number of affected LV segments (r = 0.67) or atrioventricular plane measurements (r = 0.64). Simpson's rule had low correlation to the radionuclide EF (r = 0.45 to 0.51) and could not be used in approximately half of the patients due to poor identification of endocardial borders. The interobserver coefficient of variation for independent visual echocardiographic estimation of the EF was 10%, for Simpson's rule 18%, and for the radionuclide EF 5%. We conclude that the EF estimated from quantitative echocardiographic volume calculations (Simpson's rule) may differ substantially from radionuclide methods of measuring the EF. However, with experienced sonographers, the LV wall motion score index or visual estimation of the EF had reasonable agreement with the radionuclide EF in most of the patients. Atrioventricular plane measurement is an acceptable alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514446     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00964-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  40 in total

1.  Iodine-123 MIBG imaging before treatment of heart failure with carvedilol to predict improvement of left ventricular function and exercise capacity.

Authors:  J Y Choi; K H Lee; K P Hong; B T Kim; J D Seo; W R Lee; S H Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to torsion.

Authors:  Matteo Cameli; Sergio Mondillo; Marco Solari; Francesca Maria Righini; Valentina Andrei; Carla Contaldi; Eugenia De Marco; Michele Di Mauro; Roberta Esposito; Sabina Gallina; Roberta Montisci; Andrea Rossi; Maurizio Galderisi; Stefano Nistri; Eustachio Agricola; Donato Mele
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Unreliability of cardiothoracic ratio as a marker of left ventricular impairment: comparison with radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography.

Authors:  A L Clark; A J Coats
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Short and long term prognostic importance of regional dyskinesia versus akinesia in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E Kjøller; L Køber; S Jørgensen; C Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  ACE inhibitors and heart failure in hospital: any difference between cardiologists and general physicians?

Authors:  A P Davie; J J McMurray
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Cohort study of plasma natriuretic peptides for identifying left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care.

Authors:  S J McClure; L Caruana; A P Davie; S Goldthorp; J J McMurray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-22

7.  Echocardiographic assessment of left atrioventricular plane displacement as a complement to left ventricular regional wall motion evaluation in the detection of myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  Ronnie Willenheimer; E Rydberg; M Stagmo; Petri Gudmundsson; Gerd Ericsson; Leif Erhardt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Distribution of echocardiographic parameters and their associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Isabella Kardys; Jaap W Deckers; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Wim B Vletter; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Left ventricular ejection fraction measurements: accuracy and prognostic implications in a large population of patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Patrizia Landi; Paolo Marraccini; Rosa Sicari; Paolo Frumento; Antonio L'Abbate; Daniele Rovai
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Therapeutic potential of human adipose stem cells in a rat myocardial infarction model.

Authors:  Seal Hwangbo; Jongok Kim; Sungho Her; Hyekyung Cho; Jongho Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.