Literature DB >> 9512834

[Treatment patterns of hypertension in 1996. Data from the Quebec Family Practice, University of Sherbrooke registry].

P Laplante1, T Niyonsenga, E Delisle, N Vanasse, A Vanasse, A M Grant, M Xhignesse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment of hypertension, alone or in combination with associated conditions, by a group of general practitioners in the FAMUS network and to compare these treatment patterns to the recommendations of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus.
DESIGN: Descriptive study based on data collected by 233 physicians in the FAMUS provincial register on hypertensive patients treated in 1996. PARTICIPANTS: Developed between 1992 and 1996, the register contains 52,505 patients, 9,094 of whom have high blood pressure. These patients consulted their general practitioners for a complete examination. The data concern the risk factors for cardiovascular disease and include the list of medications prescribed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of the proportions in which various classes of medications were prescribed, and the most common combinations in relation to the presence or absence of associated conditions.
RESULTS: Of the 4,049 hypertensive patients seen in 1996, 50.2% were treated with one medication; 32.9% were treated with more than one medication; and 16.9% received no antihypertensive medication. The most frequently prescribed medications were calcium channel blockers (26.1%), followed by diuretics (25.3%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (24.3%), and beta-blockers (20.0%). Other agents made up the remaining 4.3% of prescriptions. The proportions were similar for patients without complications who received one medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that the new molecules are widely used and that treatment patterns differ from the recommendations of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus, particularly in the absence of associated conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9512834      PMCID: PMC2277604     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  15 in total

Review 1.  Management of the postmyocardial infarction patient: a consensus report--revision of 1991 CCS guidelines.

Authors:  E L Fallen; J Cairns; W Dafoe; N Frasure-Smith; J Genest; D Massel; D Peretz; G J Tremblay; W L Williams
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  South Australian hypertension survey. General practitioner experiences with drug treatment.

Authors:  I D Steven; D H Wilson; M A Wakefield; J Beilby; G A Coffey; A J Esterman; A P Golding; N M Graham; J C Litt; R A Rohrsheim
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1992-05-04       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  General practitioners' management of hypertension in elderly patients.

Authors:  M D Fotherby; G D Harper; J F Potter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-26

Review 4.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 3. Pharmacologic treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  R I Ogilvie; E D Burgess; J R Cusson; R D Feldman; L A Leiter; M G Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group.

Authors:  J D Neaton; R H Grimm; R J Prineas; J Stamler; G A Grandits; P J Elmer; J A Cutler; J M Flack; J A Schoenberger; R McDonald
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Implementation of a province-wide computerized network in Quebec: the FAMUS Project.

Authors:  A Grant; E Delisle; S Dubois; T Niyonsenga; R Bernier
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb

7.  Temporal patterns of antihypertensive medication use among older adults, 1989 through 1992. An effect of the major clinical trials on clinical practice?

Authors:  B M Psaty; T D Koepsell; N D Yanez; N L Smith; T A Manolio; S R Heckbert; N O Borhani; J M Gardin; J S Gottdiener; G H Rutan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

Authors:  B J Materson; D J Reda; W C Cushman; B M Massie; E D Freis; M S Kochar; R J Hamburger; C Fye; R Lakshman; J Gottdiener
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Treatment preferences, return visit planning and factors affecting hypertension practice amongst general practitioners and internal medicine specialists (the General Practitioner Hypertension Practice Study)

Authors:  M Ribacke
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Discontinuation of and changes in treatment after start of new courses of antihypertensive drugs: a study of a United Kingdom population.

Authors:  J K Jones; L Gorkin; J F Lian; J A Staffa; A P Fletcher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The management of hypertension in Canada: a review of current guidelines, their shortcomings and implications for the future.

Authors:  F A McAlister; N R Campbell; K Zarnke; M Levine; I D Graham
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Trends in the prevalence and treatment of hypertension in Halifax County from 1985 to 1995.

Authors:  H K Wolf; P Andreou; I R Bata; D G Comeau; R D Gregor; G Kephart; D R MacLean; I Sketris
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-09-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Canada Chair in hypertension prevention and control: a pilot project.

Authors:  Norm R C Campbell
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.