Literature DB >> 7723157

Temporal patterns of antihypertensive medication use among older adults, 1989 through 1992. An effect of the major clinical trials on clinical practice?

B M Psaty1, T D Koepsell, N D Yanez, N L Smith, T A Manolio, S R Heckbert, N O Borhani, J M Gardin, J S Gottdiener, G H Rutan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the changing patterns of antihypertensive medication use in the years immediately before and after the publication of the results of three major clinical trials of the treatment of hypertension in older adults.
DESIGN: In this cohort study, adults 65 years or older were examined annually on four occasions between June 1989 and May 1992, and the use of antihypertensive medications was assessed by inventory at each visit. The four visits defined the boundaries of three study periods. For each study period, participants receiving antihypertensive therapy were either continuous users (n = 1667, 1643, and 1605, respectively) or starters (n = 157, 142, 120) of hypertensive therapy. The large clinical trials that convincingly proved the efficacy and safety of low-dose diuretic therapy in older adults were published during the latter parts of period 2 and the early parts of period 3.
RESULTS: Among starters, the proportion initiating therapy on diuretics increased from 35.9% in period 2 to 47.5% in period 3, significantly so among women (P = .04). The proportions initiating other drugs displayed no significant trends. Among continuous users, the use of diuretics, beta-blockers, and vasodilators generally decreased over the 3-year period, while the use of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors increased significantly in each of the three periods (P < .05). The decline of 2.7% in the prevalence of diuretic use in period 1 abated during period 2 (1.8% decline), and it slowed significantly (P = .03) to almost a complete halt during period 3 (0.2% decline). The rate of increase in the use of calcium channel blockers slowed significantly (P = .01) between period 1 (+6.7%) and period 3 (+2.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although other factors such as cost may have been important, the temporal trends in antihypertensive drug therapy coincided in time with and may have reflected in part the influence of the major clinical trials on the patterns of clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7723157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  16 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine: worship of form and treatment of high blood pressure.

Authors:  B M Psaty; C Rhoads; C D Furberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Old antihypertensive agents-diuretics and beta-blockers: do we know how and in whom they lower blood pressure?

Authors:  D A Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Sustained-release preparations and medication errors.

Authors:  David W Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs in primary care units in Turkey: results from the TURKSAHA study.

Authors:  Adnan Abaci; Omer Kozan; Aytekin Oguz; Mahmut Sahin; Necmi Deger; Huseyin Senocak; Nizamettin Toprak; Haydar Sur; Cetin Erol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Frequency of cardiovascular events in patients treated with anti hypertensive agents: A cohort study based on claims data generated by primary care practice.

Authors:  Pierluigi Russo; Alessandro Capone; Alessandra Sturani; Ezio Degli Esposti
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2004-09

6.  The influence of national guidelines on antihypertensive prescribing patterns.

Authors:  D Siegel
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  [Treatment patterns of hypertension in 1996. Data from the Quebec Family Practice, University of Sherbrooke registry].

Authors:  P Laplante; T Niyonsenga; E Delisle; N Vanasse; A Vanasse; A M Grant; M Xhignesse
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Treating hypertension. Are the right drugs given to the right patients?

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; L Dufresne; D LeBlanc
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Calcium antagonists in the elderly. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  J B Schwartz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Racial differences in blood pressure control: potential explanatory factors.

Authors:  Hayden B Bosworth; Benjamin Powers; Janet M Grubber; Carolyn T Thorpe; Maren K Olsen; Melinda Orr; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.