Literature DB >> 9511885

Long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter: risk prediction of recurrent arrhythmias.

C T Tai1, S A Chen, C E Chiang, S H Lee, Z C Wen, J L Huang, Y J Chen, W C Yu, A N Feng, Y J Lin, Y A Ding, M S Chang.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the predictors of recurrent atrial flutter or fibrillation after successful radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. In addition, there is only limited evidence suggesting that elimination of atrial flutter would modify the natural history of atrial fibrillation in patients who experienced both of these arrhythmias. The aims of the present study were to investigate the long-term results of radiofrequency catheter ablation and to examine the predictors for late occurrence of atrial fibrillation in a large population with typical atrial flutter. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 144 patients (mean age 56 +/- 18 years) with successful ablation of clinically documented typical atrial flutter. In the first 50 patients, successful ablation was defined as termination and noninducibility of atrial flutter; for the subsequent 94 patients, successful ablation was defined as achievement of bidirectional isthmus conduction block and no induction of atrial flutter. The clinical and echocardiographic variables were analyzed in relation to the late occurrence of atrial flutter or fibrillation. Over the follow-up period of 17 +/- 13 months, 14 (9.7%) patients had recurrence of typical atrial flutter. In the first 50 patients, 8 (16%) had recurrence of atrial flutter, compared with only 6 (6%) of the following 94 patients. Patients with incomplete isthmus block had a significantly higher incidence of recurrent atrial flutter than those with complete isthmus block (6/16 vs 0/78, P < 0.0001) in the following 94 patients. There was no predictor for recurrence of atrial flutter after successful ablation as determined by univariate and multivariate analysis. Although successful ablation of atrial flutter eliminated atrial fibrillation in 45% of patients with a prior history of atrial fibrillation, 31 (21.5%) of 144 patients undergoing this procedure developed atrial fibrillation during the follow-up period. Univariate analysis revealed that three clinical variables were related to the occurrence of atrial fibrillation: (1) the presence of structural heart disease; (2) a history of atrial fibrillation before ablation; and (3) inducible sustained atrial fibrillation after ablation. By multivariate analysis, only a history of atrial fibrillation and inducible sustained atrial fibrillation could predict the late development of atrial fibrillation after atrial flutter ablation.
CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter is highly effective and associated with a low recurrence rate of atrial flutter, but atrial fibrillation continues to be a long-term risk for patients undergoing this procedure. The presence of structural heart disease and prior spontaneous or inducible sustained atrial fibrillation increases the risk of developing atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9511885     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00892.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  27 in total

1.  Apparent bidirectional conduction block following radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  R F Quintos; T Barakat; A Mecca; B Olshansky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

Review 3.  Atrial fibrillation: the most common arrhythmia.

Authors:  C R Wyndham
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

4.  Double potential interval and transisthmus conduction time for prediction of cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Ching-Tai Tai; Azizul Haque; Yung-Kuo Lin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Yu-An Ding; Mau-Song Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Various routes of septal propagation in common atrial flutter.

Authors:  Taro Date; Kunihiko Abe; Hidekazu Miyazaki; Teiichi Yamane; Kenichi Sugimoto; Junichi Mogi; Youichi Honda; Kenji Noma; Shinichiro Ishikawa; Seibu Mochizuki
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  The roles of anatomy, image, and electrogram voltage in ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus.

Authors:  Shih-Ann Chen; Satoshi Higa
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Anatomical characteristics of the cavotricuspid isthmus in patients with and without typical atrial flutter: Analysis with two- and three-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography.

Authors:  Yasuo Okumura; Ichiro Watanabe; Sonoko Ashino; Masayoshi Kofune; Takeshi Yamada; Yasuhiro Takagi; Kazunori Kawauchi; Kimie Okubo; Kenichi Hashimoto; Atsushi Shindo; Hidezou Sugimura; Toshiko Nakai; Satoshi Saito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Quality of life and occurrence of atrial fibrillation in long-term follow-up of common type atrial flutter ablation: ablation with irrigated 5 mm tip and conventional 8 mm tip electrodes.

Authors:  Axel Meissner; Martin Christ; Petra Maagh; Rolf Borchard; Marc van Bracht; Ingo Wickenbrock; Hans-Joachim Trappe; Gunnar Plehn
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Cryothermal ablation treatment of atrial flutter--experience with a new 9 French 8 mm tip catheter.

Authors:  Annibale S Montenero; Nicola Bruno; Francesco Zumbo; Andrea Antonelli; Luigi Fiocca; Luca Barbieri; Francesca De Bernardi; Peter Andrew; Vincenzo Affinito
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Valérie Laurent; Laurent Fauchier; Bertrand Pierre; Caroline Grimard; Dominique Babuty
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.