Literature DB >> 951161

Binocular-disparity-dependent upper-lower hemifield anisotropy and left-right hemifield isotropy as revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms.

B Julesz, B Breitmeyer, W Kropfi.   

Abstract

Dynamic random-dot stereograms devoid of all monocular depth cues were used to measure the limits of temporal and spatial resolution in the center of the visual field. The temporal durations for detecting a small, briefly presented test square of different binocular disparity than the surround varied as a function of its location and binocular disparity. The test squares presented in the upper hemifield were detectable at consistently shorter durations than those presented in the lower hemifield for a surround disparity which was uncrossed relative to the fixation marker. For crossed surround disparity this preference reversed, resulting in a superiority of the lower hemifield. The anisotropy diminished for zero surround disparity. No such anisotropy was found when left and right visual hemifields were compared. It was also shown that this upper-lower temporal anisotropy (and left-right isotropy) is paralleled by a similar disparity-dependent upper-lower anistropy (and left-right isotropy) in spatial resolution. Introduction of monocular clues into the stereograms tended to eliminate the anisotropies. This implies that the anisotropies reflect the spatiotemporal properties and distribution of binocular disparity detectors in the human cortex and result in a tilted surface that pivots around the horizontal midline in the space of binocular depth perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 951161     DOI: 10.1068/p050129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  Detection duration thresholds and evoked potential measures of stereosensitivity.

Authors:  M L Manning; D C Finlay; S A Dewis; D B Dunlop
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Transition from monocular motion perception to dichoptic motion perception as a function of the stimulus duration.

Authors:  Ryusuke Hayashi; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Electrophysiological assessment of the human depth-perception threshold.

Authors:  W Wesemann; H Klingenberger; B Rassow
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  G F Poggio; W H Talbot
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Categorical perception of stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  R D Herring; H P Bechtoldt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-02

6.  Visual reaction time as a function of locus, area, and complexity of stimulus.

Authors:  A Tartaglione; E Favale; A Benton
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1979-07-04

7.  Visual field biases for near and far stimuli in disparity selective columns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis.

Authors:  B Julesz; W Kropfl; B Petrig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Ivana Tošić; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.