Literature DB >> 9509151

Evidence for the view that temporospatial integration in vision is temporally anisotropic.

D M Parker1, J R Lishman, J Hughes.   

Abstract

In two experiments low-pass and high-pass spatially filtered versions of a base image were prepared and the effect of the order of delivery of sequences of filtered and base images investigated. A task that required subjects to discriminate 120 ms presentations of a full-bandwidth base image and degraded sequences that contained sets of three different spatially filtered versions, or mixtures of spatially filtered and full-bandwidth versions of the image, were used. Each set of images used in the degraded sequences was presented either so that within the 120 ms presentation window the spatial content swept from low to high spatial frequencies or from high to low. In experiment 1 twenty subjects discriminated between a base image and degraded sequences of an urban scene. Results showed both a significant overall effect of image order, with low-to-high spatial-frequency information delivery being mistaken more often for the full-bandwidth presentation than high-to-low, and that different sets of degraded image sequences varied significantly in the frequency with which they were mistaken for the full-bandwidth presentation. In experiment 2 a base and filtered versions of a human face were used in an identical task with twenty different subjects and a very similar pattern of significant results was obtained, although imposed on a lower overall error frequency than that obtained in experiment 1. It was concluded that the results of both experiments provide evidence for an anisotropic temporospatial integration mechanism in which availability of spatial information in a low-to-high spatial-frequency sequence results in more efficient integration than a high-to-low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9509151     DOI: 10.1068/p261169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

Review 1.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes.

Authors:  D J Morrison; P G Schyns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Forward masking of faces by spatially quantized random and structured masks: on the roles of wholistic configuration, local features, and spatial-frequency spectra in perceptual identification.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann; Iiris Luiga; Endel Põder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-24

Review 3.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 4.  Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Marcos Ruiz-Soler; Francesc S Beltran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-02

5.  The neural signature of spatial frequency-based information integration in scene perception.

Authors:  Tonglin Mu; Sheng Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coarse-to-fine encoding of spatial frequency information into visual short-term memory for faces but impartial decay.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Representing the forest before the trees: a global advantage effect in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  From coarse to fine? Spatial and temporal dynamics of cortical face processing.

Authors:  Valerie Goffaux; Judith Peters; Julie Haubrechts; Christine Schiltz; Bernadette Jansma; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Short-time scale dynamics in the responses to multiple stimuli in visual cortex.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-08

10.  Is coarse-to-fine strategy sensitive to normal aging?

Authors:  Benoit Musel; Alan Chauvin; Nathalie Guyader; Sylvie Chokron; Carole Peyrin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.