Literature DB >> 9508268

Quantification in functional magnetic resonance imaging: fuzzy clustering vs. correlation analysis.

R Baumgartner1, C Windischberger, E Moser.   

Abstract

The potential of functional MRI (fMRI) data analysis using the paradigm independent fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA) applied in the time domain compared to frequently used paradigm based correlation analysis (CA) was studied with simulated and in vivo fMRI data. The performance of FCA and CA was investigated in a typical contrast-to-noise range for fMRI, ranging from 1.33 to 3.33. Using simulated fMRI data the methods were quantitatively compared in terms of generation of true positives, false positives, and the corresponding signal enhancement. Even without prior knowledge about the stimulation paradigm and the actual hemodynamic response function the performance of FCA was comparable to that of CA where extensive prior knowledge has to be added. Furthermore, discrimination of nonanticipated hemodynamic responses by FCA, such as different levels of activation and delayed response, are demonstrated in simulated and in vivo fMRI data. We demonstrate that using CA one cannot differentiate between these responses at least without extensive prior knowledge, i.e., FCA yields a more particular description of fMRI data. This may be worthwhile for analysis and optimization of data quality in fMRI as well as in the final data analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9508268     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(97)00277-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  25 in total

1.  A multistep unsupervised fuzzy clustering analysis of fMRI time series.

Authors:  M J Fadili; S Ruan; D Bloyet; B Mazoyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Feature-space clustering for fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Goutte; L K Hansen; M G Liptrot; E Rostrup
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Detection and quantification of a wide range of fMRI temporal responses using a physiologically-motivated basis set.

Authors:  Michael P Harms; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Cluster analysis of fMRI data using dendrogram sharpening.

Authors:  Larissa Stanberry; Rajesh Nandy; Dietmar Cordes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Functional connectivity mapping using the ferromagnetic Potts spin model.

Authors:  Larissa Stanberry; Alejandro Murua; Dietmar Cordes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A clinically feasible method to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Li; Yanming Yu; Yibao Zhang; Shanglian Bao; Chunxue Wu; Xiaoying Wang; Jie Li; Xiaopeng Zhang; Jiani Hu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A functional network estimation method of resting-state fMRI using a hierarchical Markov random field.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Suyash P Awate; Jeffrey S Anderson; P Thomas Fletcher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Search for patterns of functional specificity in the brain: a nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian model for group fMRI data.

Authors:  Danial Lashkari; Ramesh Sridharan; Edward Vul; Po-Jang Hsieh; Nancy Kanwisher; Polina Golland
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Discovering structure in the space of fMRI selectivity profiles.

Authors:  Danial Lashkari; Ed Vul; Nancy Kanwisher; Polina Golland
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Detecting subject-specific activations using fuzzy clustering.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Karl J Friston; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.