Literature DB >> 14673804

Cluster analysis of fMRI data using dendrogram sharpening.

Larissa Stanberry1, Rajesh Nandy, Dietmar Cordes.   

Abstract

The major disadvantage of hierarchical clustering in fMRI data analysis is that an appropriate clustering threshold needs to be specified. Upon grouping data into a hierarchical tree, clusters are identified either by specifying their number or by choosing an appropriate inconsistency coefficient. Since the number of clusters present in the data is not known beforehand, even a slight variation of the inconsistency coefficient can significantly affect the results. To address these limitations, the dendrogram sharpening method, combined with a hierarchical clustering algorithm, is used in this work to identify modality regions, which are, in essence, areas of activation in the human brain during an fMRI experiment. The objective of the algorithm is to remove data from the low-density regions in order to obtain a clearer representation of the data structure. Once cluster cores are identified, the classification algorithm is run on voxels, set aside during sharpening, attempting to reassign them to the detected groups. When applied to a paced motor paradigm, task-related activations in the motor cortex are detected. In order to evaluate the performance of the algorithm, the obtained clusters are compared to standard activation maps where the expected hemodynamic response function is specified as a regressor. The obtained patterns of both methods have a high concordance (correlation coefficient = 0.91). Furthermore, the dependence of the clustering results on the sharpening parameters is investigated and recommendations on the appropriate choice of these variables are offered. Hum. Brain Mapping 20:201-219, 2003. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14673804      PMCID: PMC6871961          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  9 in total

1.  A hierarchical clustering method for analyzing functional MR images.

Authors:  P Filzmoser; R Baumgartner; E Moser
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis.

Authors:  R Baumgartner; L Ryner; W Richter; R Summers; M Jarmasz; R Somorjai
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  On clustering fMRI time series.

Authors:  C Goutte; P Toft; E Rostrup; F Nielsen; L K Hansen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Novelty indices: identifiers of potentially interesting time-courses in functional MRI data.

Authors:  R Baumgartner; R Somorjai; R Summers; W Richter; L Ryner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Comparison of detrending methods for optimal fMRI preprocessing.

Authors:  Jody Tanabe; David Miller; Jason Tregellas; Robert Freedman; Francois G Meyer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Hierarchical clustering to measure connectivity in fMRI resting-state data.

Authors:  Dietmar Cordes; Vic Haughton; John D Carew; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Ken Maravilla
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions.

Authors:  M J McKeown; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Quantification in functional magnetic resonance imaging: fuzzy clustering vs. correlation analysis.

Authors:  R Baumgartner; C Windischberger; E Moser
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Synthetic images by subspace transforms. I. Principal components images and related filters.

Authors:  J J Sychra; P A Bandettini; N Bhattacharya; Q Lin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.071

  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  Methods for detecting functional classifications in neuroimaging data.

Authors:  F DuBois Bowman; Rajan Patel; Chengxing Lu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Connectivity-based parcellation: Critique and implications.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Bertrand Thirion; Gaël Varoquaux; Danilo Bzdok
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: multi-subject parcellation of fMRI datasets.

Authors:  Bertrand Thirion; Guillaume Flandin; Philippe Pinel; Alexis Roche; Philippe Ciuciu; Jean-Baptiste Poline
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Statistical approaches to functional neuroimaging data.

Authors:  F Dubois Bowman; Ying Guo; Gordana Derado
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Functional connectivity mapping using the ferromagnetic Potts spin model.

Authors:  Larissa Stanberry; Alejandro Murua; Dietmar Cordes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A hierarchical method for whole-brain connectivity-based parcellation.

Authors:  David Moreno-Dominguez; Alfred Anwander; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Evaluating Functional Autocorrelation within Spatially Distributed Neural Processing Networks.

Authors:  Gordana Derado; F Dubois Bowman; Timothy D Ely; Clinton D Kilts
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.582

8.  Practice-related changes in neural activation patterns investigated via wavelet-based clustering analysis.

Authors:  Jinae Lee; Cheolwoo Park; Kara A Dyckman; Nicole A Lazar; Benjamin P Austin; Qingyang Li; Jennifer E McDowell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Determining functional connectivity using fMRI data with diffusion-based anatomical weighting.

Authors:  F DuBois Bowman; Lijun Zhang; Gordana Derado; Shuo Chen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Detection of irregular, transient fMRI activity in normal controls using 2dTCA: comparison to event-related analysis using known timing.

Authors:  Victoria L Morgan; John C Gore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.