Literature DB >> 9507541

High energy radiofrequency catheter ablation for common atrial flutter targeting the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and tricuspid valve annulus using a super long tip electrode.

Y Iesaka1, A Takahashi, M Goya, T Yamane, T Tokunaga, H Amemiya, H Fujiwara, J Nitta, A Nogami, K Aonuma, M Hiroe, F Marumo, M Hiraoka.   

Abstract

There have been controversies concerning the optimal target sites and approaches in radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter. We attempted high energy radiofrequency catheter ablation targeting the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and tricuspid valve annulus (IVC-TV isthmus) with a super long (8 mm) tip electrode, and compared the efficacy of this anatomical approach with the electrophysiological approach targeting the posteroseptal right atrium posterior to the coronary sinus using a standard 4-mm tip electrode. Atrial flutter was successfully ablated in 12 of 12 patients (100%) without recurrence with the anatomical approach, while, in 7 of 9 patients (64%) with 2 recurrences with the electrophysiological approach. In comparison of ablation data between the anatomical and electrophysiological approaches, there were significant differences in the mean number of application pulses (anatomical vs electrophysiological: 2.3 +/- 0.8 vs 9.9 +/- 6.4, P < 0.01), applied wattage (39 +/- 12 W vs 24 +/- 6 W, P < 0.01), applied energy per application (1,986 +/- 426 J vs 659 +/- 323 J, P < 0.01), fluoroscopic time (26 +/- 11 min vs 74 +/- 30 minutes, P < 0.01), and procedure time (59 +/- 8 min vs 181 +/- 53 min, P < 0.01). In conclusion, the anatomical approach is superior to the electrophysiological one with respect to procedure and radiation time, and linear ablation at the IVC-TV isthmus with an 8-mm tip electrode and high energy application is highly effective and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9507541     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00064.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Various routes of septal propagation in common atrial flutter.

Authors:  Taro Date; Kunihiko Abe; Hidekazu Miyazaki; Teiichi Yamane; Kenichi Sugimoto; Junichi Mogi; Youichi Honda; Kenji Noma; Shinichiro Ishikawa; Seibu Mochizuki
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Success rate of catheter ablation in atrial flutter: comparison of a 4- or 5-mm tip electrode catheter with an 8-mm tip electrode catheter.

Authors:  Sucheta Gosavi; Greg Flaker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Management of atrial flutter.

Authors:  E Kongsgaard; H Aass
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Symptomatic improvement after radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  P A O'Callaghan; M Meara; E Kongsgaard; J Poloniecki; L Luddington; J Foran; A J Camm; E Rowland; D E Ward
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  The effect of ablation sequence and duration on lesion shape using rapidly pulsed radiofrequency energy through multiple electrodes.

Authors:  I D McRury; S Diamond; G Falwell; A Schlichting; C Wilson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Novel strategies in the ablation of typical atrial flutter: role of intracardiac echocardiography.

Authors:  Gábor Bencsik
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015

7.  Variable procedural strategies adapted to anatomical characteristics in catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus using a preoperative multidetector computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Kenta Kajihara; Yukiko Nakano; Yukoh Hirai; Hiroshi Ogi; Noboru Oda; Kazuyoshi Suenari; Yuko Makita; Akinori Sairaku; Takehito Tokuyama; Chikaaki Motoda; Mai Fujiwara; Yoshikazu Watanabe; Masao Kiguchi; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.