Literature DB >> 9505082

[Disease management. Current trend or potential solution?].

N I Schmidlin-von Ziegler1.   

Abstract

Main deficit in the present health care system is the inadequate integration of service providers into therapy procedures. Disease Management opposes (objects) this. It is a method to systematically improve quality- and economic-standards. Disease management programs include the following five elements: 1. Information standardisation and information technology, 2. improvement of therapy guidelines, 3. motivational programs for service providers and patients and 4. the patient in the centre of all activities. These four elements directly influence patient therapy. With the fifth element, Outcomes Research, treatment results can be evaluated and, if necessary, additional measures taken. With this, a line of rules is established. Looking at the results of Disease Management it becomes evident that it is an interesting starting-point which offers solutions to help eradicate deficits in the present healthcare system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9505082     DOI: 10.1007/BF03045043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)        ISSN: 0723-5003


  7 in total

1.  Using outcomes research in clinical practice.

Authors:  T Delamothe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-18

2.  The outcomes movement--will it get us where we want to go?

Authors:  A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Managed care organizations and confidential patient information: the need for a uniform standard.

Authors:  D J Weissburg
Journal:  J Health Care Finance       Date:  1995

4.  Disease management: new wine in new bottles?

Authors:  J M Harris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  From outcomes research to disease management: a guide for the perplexed.

Authors:  R S Epstein; L M Sherwood
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Disease management programs.

Authors:  E P Armstrong; P C Langley
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.

Authors:  K McPherson; J E Wennberg; O B Hovind; P Clifford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.