Literature DB >> 9504964

Possible predisposing factors for the second hip fracture.

K E Dretakis1, E K Dretakis, E F Papakitsou, S Psarakis, K Steriopoulos.   

Abstract

Among 1685 patients who sustained a hip fracture at the island of Crete (Greece) in a 4-year period we found 106 patients with bilateral noncontemporary hip fractures. Pathologic hip fractures and fractures that emerged from high energy trauma were excluded. To investigate the possible factors predisposing to the later fracture in the sound hip, we studied these 106 patients and compared them with the 1579 patients who sustained a single hip fracture (control group). There was no significant difference between the mean age of the bilateral group at the time of the first hip fracture (78.3 +/- 7.4 years, range 52-94 years) and the mean age of the control group (77.3 +/- 11.9 years, range 50-101 years). We found no significant difference in the bone status between the two groups, using both lumbar spine dual photon absorptiometry (DXA) and calcaneus broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA). Falls, which were the main cause of all the hip fractures, were much more common in the bilateral group. The second hip fracture was of the same location (trochanteric or cervical) in 92% of the trochanteric and 68% of cervical fractures and a tendency to greater displacement or instability was observed. Of the second hip fractures 75% happened in the first 48 months after the first one. The mean interval time was much longer (160 months) when a neck fracture was followed by a trochanteric one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9504964     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  36 in total

1.  Assessment of risk factors for second hip fractures in Japanese elderly.

Authors:  Akihiro Yamanashi; Kaoru Yamazaki; Masao Kanamori; Kuniyoshi Mochizuki; Shozo Okamoto; Youichi Koide; Kokai Kin; Akira Nagano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Subsequent contralateral hip fractures: can at-risk patients be identified? An observational study of 5,102 patients.

Authors:  Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum; Valér Džupa; Radek Bartoška; Daniel Říha; Petr Waldauf; Václav Báča
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Characteristics of recurrent fractures.

Authors:  J A Kanis; H Johansson; A Odén; N C Harvey; V Gudnason; K M Sanders; G Sigurdsson; K Siggeirsdottir; L A Fitzpatrick; F Borgström; E V McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Short time-frame from first to second hip fracture in the Funen County Hip Fracture Study.

Authors:  T Nymark; J M Lauritsen; O Ovesen; N D Röck; B Jeune
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteosynthetic improvement of osteoporotic bone: prevention surgery.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Deianira Luciani; Eugenio Chiarello; Matteo Cadossi; Giuseppe Tedesco; Martha Hoque; Saverio Gnudi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-01

6.  Incidence and risk factors for a second hip fracture in elderly women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; D C Bauer; M Nevitt; K Stone; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970-2009.

Authors:  Ray Marks
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

8.  Cumulative incidence and treatment of non-simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures in a cohort of one thousand two hundred and fifty patients.

Authors:  Paul T P W Burgers; Stephanie M Zielinski; Adinda K E Mailuhu; Martin J Heetveld; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Gert R Roukema; Peter Patka; Rudolf W Poolman; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence.

Authors:  L J Melton; A E Kearns; E J Atkinson; M E Bolander; S J Achenbach; J M Huddleston; T M Therneau; C L Leibson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Factors influencing the choice of 5-HT3-receptor antagonist antiemetics: focus on elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli; Matti Aapro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.