Literature DB >> 9503675

Use of Hygicult-tpc in slaughterhouse hygiene control.

T M Rahkio1, H J Korkeala.   

Abstract

Efficacy of Hygicult-tpc contact agar to control hygiene of slaughter equipment before work was studied in 3 slaughterhouses. Brushes from pork lines had higher bacterial counts (77 +/- 114 cfu on Hygicult slide) than other pieces of equipment in pork (55 +/- 101) and beef (42 +/- 110) lines. Low hygienic levels were found also in aprons, knives and conveyor belts. In general, equipment hygiene varied among the slaughterhouses studied (17 +/- 70, 45 +/- 128, 111 +/- 140) and in the comparisons of certain special equipment. Hygienic levels of the equipment were classified into 3 subclasses according to Hygicult counts. Sterilizers and saws had the lowest counts; aprons, and polishing and prescalding brushes had moderate counts. Highest counts were detected in rubber backscraping brushes and steel brushes used to clean pork carcasses and in conveyor belts. Such equipment is difficult to clean, and the bacterial count of 120 on a Hygicult slide is therefore recommended as the acceptable level after cleaning. The level of 50 on a Hygicult slide is recommended as the acceptable level for equipment, which is easy to clean. The limits recommended are based on the distribution of the Hygicult counts obtained. Hygicult-tpc is suitable for slaughterhouse hygiene control with an incubation for 72 h at 25 degrees C. The flexible handle enables sampling of surfaces that are hard to access with unflexible slides and agars.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9503675      PMCID: PMC8057024     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Vet Scand        ISSN: 0044-605X            Impact factor:   1.695


  10 in total

1.  The microbiology of the red meat carcass and the slaughterhouse.

Authors:  M Ingram; T A Roberts
Journal:  R Soc Health J       Date:  1976-12

2.  A microbiological survey of fresh meat in the supermarket trade. Part 2: beef retail cuts.

Authors:  G L Nortjé; L Nel; E Jordaan; R T Naudé; W H Holzapfel; R J Grimbeek
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Effect of pre-scalding brushing on contamination level of pork carcasses during the slaughtering process.

Authors:  M Rahkio; H Korkeala; I Sippola; M Peltonen
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Impact of animal husbandry and slaughter technologies on microbial contamination of meat: Monitoring and control.

Authors:  J H Huis In 't Veld; R W Mulder; J M Snijders
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Use of a Rapid Microbial ATP Bioluminescence Assay to Detect Contamination on Beef and Pork Carcasses .

Authors:  Gregory R Siragusa; Catherine N Cutter; Warren J Dorsa; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.077

6.  Reliability and practicability of bacteriological monitoring of beef carcass contamination and their rating within a hygiene quality control programme of abattoirs.

Authors:  F Untermann; R Stephan; U Dura; M Hofer; P Heimann
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Evaluation of a Test Strip Used to Monitor Food Processing Sanitation.

Authors:  M A Cousin
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  The Influence of Incubation Temperature on Bacterial Counts in a Meat Production System.

Authors:  G L Nortjé; L Nel; E Jordaan; K Badenhorst; G Goedhart; W H Holzapfel; R J Grimbeek
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  A note on a simple and rapid method of bacteriological sampling by means of agar sausages.

Authors:  L ten Cate
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1965-08

10.  Comparative studies on the sampling and investigation of microbial contamination of surfaces by the contact plate and swab methods.

Authors:  A Niskanen; M S Pohja
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1977-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.