Literature DB >> 9502736

Disruption of primary imprinting during oocyte growth leads to the modified expression of imprinted genes during embryogenesis.

Y Obata1, T Kaneko-Ishino, T Koide, Y Takai, T Ueda, I Domeki, T Shiroishi, F Ishino, T Kono.   

Abstract

Parthenogenetic embryos, which contained one genome from a neonate-derived non-growing oocyte and the other from a fully grown oocyte, developed to day 13.5 of gestation in mice, 3 days longer than previously recorded for parthenogenetic development. To investigate the hypothesis that disruption of primary imprinting during oocyte growth leads to the modified expression of imprinted genes and this parthenogenetic phenotype, we have examined Peg1/Mest, Igf2, Peg3, Snrpn, H19, Igf2r and excess p57KIP2. We show that paternally expressed genes, Peg1/Mest, Peg3 and Snrpn, are expressed in the parthenotes, presumably due to a lack of maternal epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth. In contrast, the expression of Igf2, which is repressed in a competitive manner by transcription of the H19 gene, was very low. Furthermore, we show that the maternally expressed Igf2r and p57KIP2 genes were repressed in the alleles of the non-growing oocyte indicating maternal modifications during oocyte growth are necessary for its expression. Thus, our results show that primary imprinting during oocyte growth exhibits a crucial effect on both the expression and repression of maternal alleles during embryogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9502736     DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  23 in total

1.  Parental origin and phenotype of triploidy in spontaneous abortions: predominance of diandry and association with the partial hydatidiform mole.

Authors:  M V Zaragoza; U Surti; R W Redline; E Millie; A Chakravarti; T J Hassold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: imprinting in clusters revisited.

Authors:  E R Maher; W Reik
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Bidirectional action of the Igf2r imprint control element on upstream and downstream imprinted genes.

Authors:  R Zwart; F Sleutels; A Wutz; A H Schinkel; D P Barlow
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  M Alleman; J Doctor
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Maternal regulation of imprinting.

Authors:  Paramasivam K Kathirvel; Prim B Singh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Autonomous silencing of the imprinted Cdkn1c gene in stem cells.

Authors:  Michelle D Wood; Hitoshi Hiura; Simon J Tunster; Takahiro Arima; Jong-Yeon Shin; Michael J Higgins; Rosalind M John
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 7.  The Exposome Research Paradigm: an Opportunity to Understand the Environmental Basis for Human Health and Disease.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Melissa M Smarr; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

8.  Epigenetic disruptions of histone signatures for the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in mouse parthenogenetic embryos.

Authors:  Yi-Hui Chen; John Yu
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.272

9.  Development of fertile mouse oocytes from mitotic germ cells in vitro.

Authors:  Kanako Morohaku; Yuji Hirao; Yayoi Obata
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Analysis of imprinted murine Peg3 locus in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Irene Y Y Szeto; Sheila C Barton; E B Keverne; Azim M Surani
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.