Literature DB >> 9502715

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments.

T Kimura1, S Sakuramachi, M Yoshida, T Kobayashi, Y Takeuchi.   

Abstract

The advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are based on its low invasiveness due to the small surgical wounds. If LC could be performed using fine-caliber instruments, these advantages would be amplified. We developed 3-mm-caliber instruments and performed LC in 20 patients using one 5-mm and two 3-mm instrument ports. The results were retrospectively compared with those of standard LC. The operating time (107.2 +/- 50.0 min), complication rate (0%), number of doses of analgesia (0.80 +/- 0.83), and postoperative hospital stay (4.9 +/- 1.2 days) were not significantly different between our method and standard LC. At 6 months postoperatively, the scars were smaller with our method. Surgery using fine-caliber instruments was no more difficult than standard LC and achieved a superior cosmetic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9502715     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

Review 1.  New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gaillard; Hadrien Tranchart; Panagiotis Lainas; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for a giant splenic epidermoid cyst: report of a case.

Authors:  Y Sakamoto; S Yunotani; G Edakuni; M Mori; A Iyama; K Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon's initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kurt E Roberts; Daniel Solomon; Andrew J Duffy; Robert L Bell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a "true" outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; J W Lin; M A Talamini; C J Yeo; D S Snyder; S D Parker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Smaller is better.

Authors:  S W Unger; J Paramo; M Perez-Izquierdo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments.

Authors:  T Kimura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments. Smaller is not necessarily better.

Authors:  G Berci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Twenty years of mini-laparoscopy in Brazil: What we have learned so far.

Authors:  Diego Laurentino Lima; Gustavo Lopes Carvalho; Raquel Nogueira Cordeiro
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients.

Authors:  P L Leggett; C D Bissell; R Churchman-Winn; C Ahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Rory McCloy; Delia Randall; Stephan A Schug; Henrik Kehlet; Christian Simanski; Francis Bonnet; Frederic Camu; Barrie Fischer; Girish Joshi; Narinder Rawal; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.