Literature DB >> 9502645

Digital cellular telephone interaction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

J G Fetter1, V Ivans, D G Benditt, J Collins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine, in vivo, whether electromagnetic interference (EMI), generated by North American Digital Communications (NADC)/Time Division Multiple Access-50-Hz (TDMA-50) mobile cellular digital telephone model AT&T 6650, disturbs normal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) operation and to verify these observations in vitro by testing a selection of telephones representing worldwide systems.
METHODS: The effects of cellular phone interference on the operation of various models of market-released ICDs from a single manufacturer, Medtronic, Inc., were tested. The in vivo clinical test was undertaken in 41 patients using the AT&T 6650 digital telephone with the NADC/TDMA-50 technology. The in vitro component of the study was examined twofold: 1) antenna generated far field; and 2) analog/digital cellular telephone near field.
RESULTS: None of the ICDs tested in 41 patients were affected by oversensing of the EMI field of the cellular telephones during the in vivo study. Therefore, the binomial upper 95% confidence limit for the failure rate of 0% is 7%. The in vitro antenna-generated field testing showed that telephone modulation frequencies used in the international Global System Mobile and TDMA-50 cellular telephone technologies did not result in ICD sensing interference at the predicted electric field intensity. The in vitro near field tests were performed using both analog and digital cellular telephones in service, or in the test mode, and indicated no interaction with normal operation. However, the static magnetic field generated by the cellular telephone placed over the ICD at a distance < or = 0.5 cm will activate the internal reed switch, resulting in temporary suspension of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation detection.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that TDMA-50 cellular telephones did not interfere with these types of ICDs. However, we recommend that the patient not carry or place the digital cellular telephone within 15 cm (6 in.) of the ICD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9502645     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00546-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

1.  Effects of mobile telephones on the function of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Izzet Tandogan; Bulent Ozin; Huseyin Bozbas; Sibel Turhan; Ramazan Ozdemir; Ertan Yetkin; Ergun Topal
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Inappropriate ICD discharge induced by electrical interference from a physio-therapeutic muscle stimulation device.

Authors:  H Nägele; M Azizi
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2006-09

3.  Electromagnetic interference of wireless local area network on electrocardiogram monitoring system: a case report.

Authors:  Seungmin Chung; Joohee Yi; Seung Woo Park
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  A novel heart/trunk simulator for the study of electromagnetic interference with active implantable devices.

Authors:  A Angeloni; V Barbaro; P Bartolini; G Calcagnini; F Censi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Interference between cellular telephones and implantable rhythm devices: a review on recent papers.

Authors:  Johnson Francis; Michael Niehaus
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-10-01

6.  Driving electrochemical corrosion of implanted CoCrMo metal via oscillatory electric fields without mechanical wear.

Authors:  Thomas S Welles; Jeongmin Ahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.