Literature DB >> 9502366

Medication management of depression in the United States and Ontario.

S J Katz1, R C Kessler, E Lin, K B Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of contact for mental problems and receipt of appropriate antidepressant medication management for persons in the general population with major depression in the United States and Ontario, Canada.
DESIGN: Survey using the U.S. National Comorbidity Survey and the Mental Health Supplement of the Ontario Health Survey. PARTICIPANTS: All persons with major depression as described in DSM-III-R in the previous 12 months, from a multistage random sample of persons aged 21 to 54 years living in households in the United States (n = 574) and Ontario (n = 250) in 1990.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Self-reported contact with general medical or mental health specialty providers for mental problems and appropriate medication management, defined as a combination of antidepressant medication use and four or more visits to any provider within the previous 12 months, were the main outcome measures. The proportion of depressed persons receiving appropriate management was lower in the United States than in Ontario (7.3% vs 14.9% in Ontario, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 95% CI 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 0.8). This difference was largely the result of fewer Americans than Canadians having any mental health care from general medical physicians (9.6% in the United States vs 25.8% in Ontario; AOR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1, 0.5) rather than from specialty providers (20.8% in the United States vs 28.9% in Ontario; AOR 0.7; 95% CI 0.4, 1.1). These between-country differences were much greater for the poor than for those with higher incomes. The Ontario-United States AOR of making contact with either type of clinical provider was 7.5 (95% CI 2.7, 20.7) for lowest-income persons but 2.1 (95% CI 0.3, 5.6) for highest-income persons. The proportions of depressed recipients of any mental health care who received appropriate management were similar between countries (23.9% in the United States vs 27.7% in Ontario; AOR 0.8; 95% CI 0.3, 1.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Most persons with depression in the United States and Ontario do not receive appropriate medication management. The rate of appropriate medication management in the United States relative to Ontario is lower largely because there is less contact with general medical physicians for mental problems, especially for the poor. Economic barriers, rather than knowledge and attitudinal factors, appear to explain this difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9502366      PMCID: PMC1496914          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00022.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  25 in total

1.  Measuring the need for mental health care.

Authors:  G L Klerman; M Olfson; A C Leon; M M Weissman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  A model mental health benefit in private health insurance.

Authors:  R G Frank; H H Goldman; T G McGuire
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Adequacy and duration of antidepressant treatment in primary care.

Authors:  W Katon; M von Korff; E Lin; T Bush; J Ormel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Factors affecting the utilization of specialty and general medical mental health services.

Authors:  P J Leaf; M L Bruce; G L Tischler; D H Freeman; M M Weissman; J K Myers
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Contact with health professionals for the treatment of psychiatric and emotional problems.

Authors:  P J Leaf; M M Livingston; G L Tischler; M M Weissman; C E Holzer; J K Myers
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Depression in medical outpatients. Underrecognition and misdiagnosis.

Authors:  E J Pérez-Stable; J Miranda; R F Muñoz; Y W Ying
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-05

7.  Sociodemographic factors and the use of outpatient mental health services.

Authors:  K B Wells; W G Manning; N Duan; J P Newhouse; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The use of outpatient mental health services in the United States and Ontario: the impact of mental morbidity and perceived need for care.

Authors:  S J Katz; R C Kessler; R G Frank; P Leaf; E Lin; M Edlund
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services.

Authors:  D A Regier; W E Narrow; D S Rae; R W Manderscheid; B Z Locke; F K Goodwin
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1993-02

10.  Treatments of depression and the functional capacity to work.

Authors:  J Mintz; L I Mintz; M J Arruda; S S Hwang
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-10
View more
  30 in total

1.  Managing patients with depression: is primary care up to the challenge?

Authors:  D E Ford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Adequacy of treatment for serious mental illness in the United States.

Authors:  Philip S Wang; Olga Demler; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  The unknown mechanism of the overtraining syndrome: clues from depression and psychoneuroimmunology.

Authors:  Lawrence E Armstrong; Jaci L VanHeest
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  A Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network Study Evaluating Antidepressant Prescribing in Canada From 2006 to 2012.

Authors:  Rachael Morkem; David Barber; Tyler Williamson; Scott B Patten
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.356

5.  Perceived need for alcohol, drug, and mental health treatment.

Authors:  Mark J Edlund; Jürgen Unützer; Geoffrey M Curran
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Use of depression education materials to improve treatment compliance of primary care patients.

Authors:  Francisca Azocar; Robert B Branstrom
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Anxiety in primary care.

Authors:  Kristen Hope Demertzis; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Primary care patients with depression are less accepting of treatment than those seen by mental health specialists.

Authors:  Benjamin W Van Voorhees; Lisa A Cooper; Kathryn M Rost; Paul Nutting; Lisa V Rubenstein; Lisa Meredith; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.