OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether depressed patients treated exclusively in primary care report less need for care and less acceptability of treatment options than those depressed patients treated in the specialty mental health setting after up to 6 months of treatment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Forty-five community primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 881 persons with major depression who had received mental health services in the previous 6 months and who enrolled in 3 of the 4 Quality Improvement for Depression Collaboration Studies. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: 1) having received mental health services exclusively from a primary care provider (45%), or 2) having received any services from a mental health specialist (55%) in the previous 6 months. Compared with patients who received care from mental health specialists, patients who received mental health services exclusively from primary care providers had 2.7-fold the odds (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 4.4) of reporting that no treatment was definitely acceptable and had 2.4-fold the odds (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.9) of reporting that evidence-based treatment options (antidepressant medication) were definitely not acceptable. These results were adjusted for demographic, social/behavioral, depression severity, and economic factors using multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with depression treated exclusively by primary care providers have attitudes and beliefs more averse to care than those seen by mental health specialists. These differences in attitudes and beliefs may contribute to lower quality depression care observed in comparisons of primary care and specialty mental health providers.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether depressedpatients treated exclusively in primary care report less need for care and less acceptability of treatment options than those depressedpatients treated in the specialty mental health setting after up to 6 months of treatment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Forty-five community primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 881 persons with major depression who had received mental health services in the previous 6 months and who enrolled in 3 of the 4 Quality Improvement for Depression Collaboration Studies. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS:Patients were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: 1) having received mental health services exclusively from a primary care provider (45%), or 2) having received any services from a mental health specialist (55%) in the previous 6 months. Compared with patients who received care from mental health specialists, patients who received mental health services exclusively from primary care providers had 2.7-fold the odds (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 4.4) of reporting that no treatment was definitely acceptable and had 2.4-fold the odds (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.9) of reporting that evidence-based treatment options (antidepressant medication) were definitely not acceptable. These results were adjusted for demographic, social/behavioral, depression severity, and economic factors using multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with depression treated exclusively by primary care providers have attitudes and beliefs more averse to care than those seen by mental health specialists. These differences in attitudes and beliefs may contribute to lower quality depression care observed in comparisons of primary care and specialty mental health providers.
Authors: Paul A Nutting; Kathryn Rost; Miriam Dickinson; James J Werner; Perry Dickinson; Jeffrey L Smith; Beth Gallovic Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: A S Carter; F E Garrity-Rokous; R Chazan-Cohen; C Little; M J Briggs-Gowan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Benjamin W Van Voorhees; Joshua Fogel; Thomas K Houston; Lisa A Cooper; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Michel Joffres; Alejandra Jaramillo; James Dickinson; Gabriela Lewin; Kevin Pottie; Elizabeth Shaw; Sarah Connor Gorber; Marcello Tonelli Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Richard L Kravitz; Peter Franks; Mitchell Feldman; Lisa S Meredith; Ladson Hinton; Carol Franz; Paul Duberstein; Ronald M Epstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Benjamin W Van Voorhees; Justin M Ellis; Jackie K Gollan; Carl C Bell; Scott S Stuart; Joshua Fogel; Patrick W Corrigan; Daniel E Ford Journal: Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2007
Authors: Jeffrey C Eisen; Monika Marko-Holguin; Joshua Fogel; Alonso Cardenas; My Bahn; Nathan Bradford; Blake Fagan; Peggy Wiedmann; Benjamin W Van Voorhees Journal: Prim Care Companion CNS Disord Date: 2013-12-19