Literature DB >> 9500375

Biomechanical evaluation of titanium, biodegradable plate and screw, and cyanoacrylate glue fixation systems in craniofacial surgery.

A K Gosain1, L Song, M A Corrao, F A Pintar.   

Abstract

Choice of appropriate fixation after reduction of displaced bone fragments or advancement of osteotomized segments requires knowledge of the maximal force to which these segments can be subjected. The present study was performed to obtain a biomechanical comparison of a variety of resorbable fixation systems as an alternative to metal plates and screws. Sheep cadaver parietal bone segments were osteotomized and fixed with one of six methods of fixation: (A) titanium plates and screws consisting of (1) miniplates and 2.0-mm-diameter screws; (2) midface plates and 1.5-mm screws; (3) microplates and 1.0-mm screws; (B) resorbable systems consisting of combinations of butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue and biodegradable polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer plates and 2.0-mm screws as follows: (1) direct glue fixation of segments; (2) resorbable plates fixed to bone segments with cyanoacrylate glue; (3) resorbable plates fixed with resorbable screws. Compression testing was performed upon bone segments advanced and fixed across a central gap, and distraction testing was performed on bone segments fixed in direct contact. Force to failure in both distraction and compression was significantly greater in bone segments fixed with titanium miniplates than with any other method of fixation. Segments fixed with plates and screws, either nonresorbable or resorbable, achieved stronger fixation in distraction than in compression for all plate sizes tested. Resorbable plate and screw fixation was as strong as standard titanium midface and microplating systems in distraction, and stronger than the latter techniques in compression. With compressive forces of relapse, fixation with glue and resorbable plates was as strong as standard titanium midface and microplating systems. However, with distractive forces of relapse, glue fixation of either the bone segments or resorbable plates was weaker than both titanium and resorbable alternatives in which plates and screws were used. These findings may have direct impact on the choice of fixation devices used to support osteotomized or fractured bone segments, which are subjected to persistent muscular and soft-tissue pull.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9500375     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199803000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  16 in total

1.  Choice of internal rigid fixation materials in the treatment of facial fractures.

Authors:  Mirko S Gilardino; Elliot Chen; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

2.  [Challenging the dogma on inferiority of stainless steel implants for fracture fixation. An end of the controversy?].

Authors:  S Weckbach; J T Losacco; J Hahnhaussen; F Gebhard; P F Stahel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Foreign body reaction to materials implanted as biocompatible for internal fixation].

Authors:  Alexander Thiele; U Bilkenroth; M Bloching; St Knipping
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

Authors:  David J Bonda; Sunil Manjila; Warren R Selman; David Dean
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Aesthetic Correction of a Protrusive Forehead through Repositioning of the Anterior Wall of the Frontal Sinus.

Authors:  Daniel Seungyoul Han; Jin Hyung Park
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-23

6.  Biocompatibility of adhesive complex coacervates modeled after the sandcastle glue of Phragmatopoma californica for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Brent D Winslow; Hui Shao; Russell J Stewart; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Bond strength evaluation of cyanoacrylate-based adhesives and screws for bone fixation.

Authors:  Juliana de Souza Vieira; Felipe Rychuv Santos; Jessica Vavassori de Freitas; Flares Baratto-Filho; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Melissa Rodrigues de Araujo
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-01-06

8.  Use of N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate (Glubran2(®)) in Fractures of Orbital-Maxillo-Zygomatic Complex.

Authors:  Enrico Foresta; Andrea Torroni; Giulio Gasparini; Gianmarco Saponaro; Giuliana Longo; Roberto Boniello; Daniele Cervelli; Tito Matteo Marianetti; Sandro Pelo; Alessandro Moro
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-02-11

9.  Microstructural Analysis of Fractured Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Mateusz Kopec; Adam Brodecki; Grzegorz Szczęsny; Zbigniew L Kowalewski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Valentina Siracusa; Giuseppe Maimone; Vincenzo Antonelli
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.