J K Shim1, S Johnson, M H Samore, D Z Bliss, D N Gerding. 1. Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Chicago Healthcare System, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether patients who develop Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) are culture-positive or culture-negative before illness. The most important risk factor is antibiotic exposure. We aimed to find out whether patients identified as primary symptom-free C difficile carriers are at higher risk of developing CDAD than patients who are culture-negative. METHOD: We reviewed four longitudinal studies in which 810 patients admitted to hospital were followed up by prospective rectal-swab culture. At least two consecutive weekly cultures were obtained. We calculated the difference in risk of CDAD between colonised and non-colonised patients in each study and combined the results of the four studies in a random-effects model. FINDINGS: Of 618 non-colonised patients (mean follow-up 1.7 weeks [SD 1.3]), 22 (3.6%) developed CDAD, whereas only two (1.0%) of 192 primary symptom-free carriers (1.5 [1.5]) developed CDAD (pooled risk difference -2.3% [95% CI 0.3-4.3], p=0.021). Of patients who received antibiotics, the risk difference was increased: 22 (4.5%) of 491 non-colonised patients compared with two (1.1%) of 176 colonised patients developed CDAD (-3.2% [0.4-6.0], p=0.024). Of the primary symptom-free C difficile carriers, 95 were colonised with toxigenic strains, 76 with non-toxigenic strains, 12 with both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains (non-concurrently), and nine with strains of undetermined toxigenicity. Nine of the 12 toxogenic strains of C difficile isolates that cause CDAD were also recovered from stools of symptom-free patients. INTERPRETATION: Primary symptomless C difficile colonisation is associated with a decreased risk of CDAD. Although the mechanism is unknown, risk reduction is found in colonisation with non-toxigenic and toxigenic strains.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether patients who develop Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) are culture-positive or culture-negative before illness. The most important risk factor is antibiotic exposure. We aimed to find out whether patients identified as primary symptom-free C difficile carriers are at higher risk of developing CDAD than patients who are culture-negative. METHOD: We reviewed four longitudinal studies in which 810 patients admitted to hospital were followed up by prospective rectal-swab culture. At least two consecutive weekly cultures were obtained. We calculated the difference in risk of CDAD between colonised and non-colonised patients in each study and combined the results of the four studies in a random-effects model. FINDINGS: Of 618 non-colonised patients (mean follow-up 1.7 weeks [SD 1.3]), 22 (3.6%) developed CDAD, whereas only two (1.0%) of 192 primary symptom-free carriers (1.5 [1.5]) developed CDAD (pooled risk difference -2.3% [95% CI 0.3-4.3], p=0.021). Of patients who received antibiotics, the risk difference was increased: 22 (4.5%) of 491 non-colonised patients compared with two (1.1%) of 176 colonised patients developed CDAD (-3.2% [0.4-6.0], p=0.024). Of the primary symptom-free C difficile carriers, 95 were colonised with toxigenic strains, 76 with non-toxigenic strains, 12 with both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains (non-concurrently), and nine with strains of undetermined toxigenicity. Nine of the 12 toxogenic strains of C difficile isolates that cause CDAD were also recovered from stools of symptom-free patients. INTERPRETATION: Primary symptomless C difficile colonisation is associated with a decreased risk of CDAD. Although the mechanism is unknown, risk reduction is found in colonisation with non-toxigenic and toxigenic strains.
Authors: Kristina Oresic Bender; Megan Garland; Jessica A Ferreyra; Andrew J Hryckowian; Matthew A Child; Aaron W Puri; David E Solow-Cordero; Steven K Higginbottom; Ehud Segal; Niaz Banaei; Aimee Shen; Justin L Sonnenburg; Matthew Bogyo Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Mukil Natarajan; Mary Am Rogers; Jacob Bundy; Dejan Micic; Seth T Walk; Kavitha Santhosh; Krishna Rao; Spencer Winters; Vincent B Young; David M Aronoff Journal: Clin Res Infect Dis Date: 2015-08-03
Authors: Nicola L Davies; Joanne E Compson; Brendon Mackenzie; Victoria L O'Dowd; Amanda K F Oxbrow; James T Heads; Alison Turner; Kaushik Sarkar; Sarah L Dugdale; Mark Jairaj; Louis Christodoulou; David E O Knight; Amanda S Cross; Karine J M Hervé; Kerry L Tyson; Hanna Hailu; Carl B Doyle; Mark Ellis; Marco Kriek; Matthew Cox; Matthew J T Page; Adrian R Moore; Daniel J Lightwood; David P Humphreys Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2013-01-16