Literature DB >> 11326003

Evaluation of biosite triage Clostridium difficile panel for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples.

M L Landry1, J Topal, D Ferguson, D Giudetti, Y Tang.   

Abstract

One hundred two stool samples were tested by both the rapid Triage Clostridium difficile Panel (Triage Panel) and the cytotoxin cell culture assay. Five samples positive by both the C. difficile toxin A (Tox A) and common antigen components of the Triage Panel had cytotoxin titers of > or =10,000. Twenty-three samples were Triage Panel Tox A negative but common antigen positive. Ten of these had cytotoxin titers of 10 to 1,000, but 13 were cytotoxin negative. Bacterial isolates obtained from 8 of these 13 specimens were analyzed for Tox A and B genes by PCR, and only two contained toxigenic bacteria. Thus, the majority of samples positive only for C. difficile common antigen contained nontoxigenic bacteria. A Triage Panel Tox A-positive result indicated a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 33.3, 100, 100, and 88.2%, respectively. A Triage Panel common antigen-positive result indicated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100, 82.7, 53.6, and 100%, respectively. The high NPV of the Triage Panel common antigen, together with rapid reporting of results, should prove useful in avoiding unnecessary use of contact precautions and antibiotic treatment for C. difficile-negative patients. However, with Triage Panel common antigen-positive patients, a sensitive cytotoxin assay should be used to distinguish true cytotoxin-positive patients from C. difficile carriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11326003      PMCID: PMC88038          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1855-1858.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  14 in total

1.  Is there a relationship between vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection and Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  D N Gerding
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Nontoxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile lack the genes for both toxin A and toxin B.

Authors:  A C Fluit; M J Wolfhagen; G P Verdonk; M Jansze; R Torensma; J Verhoef
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile--associated diarrhea.

Authors:  S Johnson; D N Gerding
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  J S Garner
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococcal bacteremia: comparison of clinical features and outcomes.

Authors:  G M Lucas; N Lechtzin; D W Puryear; L L Yau; C W Flexner; R D Moore
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Isolation of various genotypes of Clostridium difficile from patients and the environment in an oncology ward.

Authors:  S H Cohen; Y J Tang; J Muenzer; P H Gumerlock; J Silva
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Multicenter evaluation of the Clostridium difficile TOX A/B TEST.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; L M Neville; D T Evans; J Fill; S Allen; W Greene; R Sautter; P Hnatuck; D J Torpey; R Schwalbe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Primary symptomless colonisation by Clostridium difficile and decreased risk of subsequent diarrhoea.

Authors:  J K Shim; S Johnson; M H Samore; D Z Bliss; D N Gerding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Acquisition of Clostridium difficile by hospitalized patients: evidence for colonized new admissions as a source of infection.

Authors:  C R Clabots; S Johnson; M M Olson; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the specific and direct detection of Clostridium difficile in human feces.

Authors:  P H Gumerlock; Y J Tang; F J Meyers; J Silva
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec
View more
  6 in total

1.  Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.

Authors:  John R Ticehurst; Deborah Z Aird; Lisa M Dam; Anita P Borek; John T Hargrove; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: Comparison of Techlab C. diff Quik Chek Complete, Xpert C. difficile, and multistep algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Ja Young Seo; Ji Hun Jeong; Kyung Hee Kim; Jeong-Yeal Ahn; Pil-Whan Park; Yiel-Hea Seo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in feces by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Simon D Bélanger; Maurice Boissinot; Natalie Clairoux; François J Picard; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: current strategies for diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Munshi Moyenuddin; John C Williamson; Christopher A Ohl
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-08

5.  Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Heather Snell; Meredith Ramos; Sue Longo; Michael John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Rabbit gastroenterology.

Authors:  Brigitte Reusch
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract       Date:  2005-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.