Literature DB >> 9499354

Urine culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of contaminated urine cultures in 906 institutions.

P Valenstein1, F Meier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency and causes of urine culture contamination in outpatients.
METHODS: Nine hundred six institutions, ranging in size from less than 50 to more than 600 beds, each examined 250 consecutively ordered urine cultures from outpatients and identified specimens that met the study definition of contamination. Participants also answered questions about the practices used to collect, transport, and process urine specimens. In all, data relating to more than 200,000 urine cultures were analyzed.
RESULTS: The median institution reported that 18.1% of urine cultures specimens collected from outpatients were contaminated. The top 10% of institutions (90th percentile) reported that 5.6% or fewer of their cultures were contaminated. In contrast, the bottom 10% of institutions (10th percentile) reported that 36.8% or more of their urine specimens were contaminated. Institutions with lower contamination rates tended to process a lower proportion of specimens from female patients. Pediatric hospitals also reported lower contamination rates in specimens from children than general hospitals. Other factors, including the use of central processing areas, refrigeration, urine screening systems, specimen preservatives, provision of written collection instructions or special collection kits, and thermally insulated specimen transport containers, were not found to be associated with low specimen contamination rates in a multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Contamination of outpatient urine cultures is a common occurrence, and facilities differ significantly in their overall frequency of urine culture contamination. Many interventions commonly assumed to reduce contamination were not demonstrably effective in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9499354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  6 in total

1.  Electrolyte disturbances in acute pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Maite Augusta Gil-Ruiz; Andrés José Alcaraz; Rafael José Marañón; Nelia Navarro; Belén Huidobro; Augusto Luque
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  ACP Best Practice No 167: the laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

Authors:  J C Graham; A Galloway
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Urinalysis and urinary tract infection: update for clinicians.

Authors:  J L Young; D E Soper
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001

4.  Effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting midstream urine specimens.

Authors:  Rashmi Shrestha; Narayan Gyawali; Rajendra Gurung; Ritu Amatya; Shyamal Kumar Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2013-01

5.  The diagnostic value of rapid urine test platform UF-5000 for suspected urinary tract infection at the emergency department.

Authors:  Tsun Tsun Stacia Chun; Xiaohao Ruan; Sau Loi Ng; Hoi Lung Wong; Brian Sze Ho Ho; Chiu Fung Tsang; Terence Chun Ting Lai; Ada Tsui Lin Ng; Wai Kit Ma; Wayne Pei Lam; Rong Na; James Hok Leung Tsu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.073

6.  Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark T LaRocco; Jacob Franek; Elizabeth K Leibach; Alice S Weissfeld; Colleen S Kraft; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Debra Rodahl; Edward J Peterson; Nancy E Cornish
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 26.132

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.