Literature DB >> 9496390

Relationships between biochemical and symptomatic response in a double-blind randomised trial of pamidronate for metastatic bone disease.

J J Vinholes1, O P Purohit, M E Abbey, R Eastell, R E Coleman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate pamidronate for bone pain in a randomised double-blind trial and to evaluate the contribution of new markers of bone resorption in patients with bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with painful bone metastases were randomised to receive a two-hour infusion of pamidronate 120 mg or an identical infusion of saline. Four weeks later, all patients received pamidronate 120 mg. Bone resorption markers measured included urinary calcium (uCa), hydroxyproline (Hyp), and the collagen breakdown products: NTx, Crosslaps and Free Dpd.
RESULTS: Symptomatic response during the first four weeks was seen after pamidronate, but not with placebo (P < 0.05). Quality of life was maintained with pamidronate and deteriorated after placebo (P < 0.05). Resorption markers did not decrease after placebo, but NTx and Crosslaps both decreased by 70% after pamidronate (P = 0.001). A second infusion of pamidronate did not decrease resorption further, but maintained the suppression of resorption at similar levels for a further four weeks. Symptomatic response to pamidronate correlated closely with the rate of bone resorption; it was more frequent in those patients with an initial NTx value of < 2 times the upper limit of normal (17 of 27, 62%) and in those where the level of Ntx returned to normal (19 of 32, 59%), than in the patients with either high baseline values of NTx (> 2 times the upper limit of normal) or Ntx levels which failed to normalise for whom the response frequencies were 2 of 16 (13%) and 0 of 11 (0%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective benefit after intravenous pamidronate is confirmed in this placebo-controlled study. The new bone resorption markers of collagen breakdown were able to predict clinical response to pamidronate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9496390     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008238422151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  25 in total

Review 1.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Malignant bone pain: pathophysiology and treatments.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; F Fulfaro
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Strategies for management of prostate cancer-related bone pain.

Authors:  R C Pelger; V Soerdjbalie-Maikoe; N A Hamdy
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Once-daily dasatinib: expansion of phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of dasatinib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Evan Y Yu; Christophe Massard; Mitchell E Gross; Michael A Carducci; Stephane Culine; Gary Hudes; Edwin M Posadas; Cora N Sternberg; George Wilding; Géralyn C Trudel; Prashni Paliwal; Karim Fizazi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Bisphosphonates for malignancy-related bone disease: current status, future developments.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Body
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  The clinical and cost considerations of bisphosphonates in preventing bone complications in patients with metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; J F Guest; J A Kanis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Bisphosphonates in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Body
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 8.  Bisphosphonate treatment and radiotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A Ugur Ural; Ferit Avcu; Yusuf Baran
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Bone markers and their prognostic value in metastatic bone disease: clinical evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Robert Coleman; Janet Brown; Evangelos Terpos; Allan Lipton; Matthew R Smith; Richard Cook; Pierre Major
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Quality of life measurement in cancer patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic lung cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  N Salvo; S Hadi; J Napolskikh; P Goh; E Sinclair; E Chow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.