Literature DB >> 11511021

The clinical and cost considerations of bisphosphonates in preventing bone complications in patients with metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma.

E V McCloskey1, J F Guest, J A Kanis.   

Abstract

The bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and are now the treatment of choice for the management of hypercalcaemia of malignancy. The incidences of hypercalcaemia and other skeletal complications (bone pain, pathological fracture) remain high despite apparent responses to systemic therapy, with particularly high event rates in women with advanced skeletal metastases of breast cancer. This review focuses on studies addressing the long-term efficacy of bisphosphonates to reduce skeletal complications in breast cancer (5 studies) and multiple myeloma (4 studies), with particular reference to controlled studies of sufficient magnitude and duration to allow confidence in the estimation of efficacy. Bearing in mind the limitations of differences in trial design and the lack of direct studies comparing drugs, adequate exposure to a bisphosphonate reduces the incidence of skeletal complication by 30 to 40% in both breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Oral clondronate and intravenous pamidronate have similar efficacy in both diseases, but the duration of efficacy may differ between drugs. Both agents have shown intriguing survival benefits in subgroups of patients. The numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent a skeletal complication during one year are lowest in metastatic skeletal disease in breast cancer (NNT < 8) but also compare very favourably with other disease for patients with recurrent nonskeletal breast cancer or multiple myeloma (NNTs 7 to 31 depending on the complication to be prevented). Treatment costs of both breast cancer and multiple myloma are driven by inpatient and outpatient hospital visits so that bisphosphonate regimens should be developed that reduce both. Further research is required to determine if subgroups of patients can be better identified that will derive particular benefit, or perhaps no benefit at all, from bisphosphonate therapy. It is not known whether more potent bisphosphonates will deliver greater clinical efficacy in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11511021     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200161090-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  97 in total

Review 1.  Effects of clodronate on immobilization bone loss.

Authors:  P Minaire; J Depassio; E Berard; P J Meunier; C Edouard; G Pilonchery; G Goedert
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Economic impact of using clodronate in the management of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  N J Bruce; E V McCloskey; J A Kanis; J F Guest
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Bisphosphonate risedronate prevents bone loss in women with artificial menopause due to chemotherapy of breast cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  P D Delmas; R Balena; E Confravreux; C Hardouin; P Hardy; A Bremond
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Inhibition of osteolytic bone metastasis of breast cancer by combined treatment with the bisphosphonate ibandronate and tissue inhibitor of the matrix metalloproteinase-2.

Authors:  T Yoneda; A Sasaki; C Dunstan; P J Williams; F Bauss; Y A De Clerck; G R Mundy
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  A single infusion of the bisphosphonate AHPrBP (APD) as treatment of Paget's disease of bone.

Authors:  D Thiébaud; P Jaeger; C Gobelet; A F Jacquet; P Burckhardt
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Influence of early age at menopause on vertebral bone mass.

Authors:  J M Pouillès; F Trémollières; M Bonneu; C Ribot
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Finnish Leukaemia Group.

Authors:  R Lahtinen; M Laakso; I Palva; P Virkkunen; I Elomaa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-10-31       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Effect of glucocorticoids on the biologic activities of myeloma cells: inhibition of interleukin-1 beta osteoclast activating factor-induced bone resorption.

Authors:  H Ishikawa; H Tanaka; K Iwato; O Tanabe; H Asaoku; M Nobuyoshi; I Yamamoto; M Kawano; A Kuramoto
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Does myeloma secrete an osteoblast inhibiting factor?

Authors:  C E Evans; C S Galasko; C Ward
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-03

10.  Effect of tamoxifen on bone mineral density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in healthy premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  T J Powles; T Hickish; J A Kanis; A Tidy; S Ashley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Clodronate : a review of its use in the prevention of bone metastases and the management of skeletal complications associated with bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Toni M Dando; Lynda R Wiseman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Adjuvant oral clodronate improves the overall survival of primary breast cancer patients with micrometastases to the bone marrow: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  I J Diel; A Jaschke; E F Solomayer; C Gollan; G Bastert; C Sohn; F Schuetz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The influence of orthopedic corsets on the incidence of pathological fractures in patients with spinal bone metastases after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Harald Rief; Robert Förster; Stefan Rieken; Thomas Bruckner; Ingmar Schlampp; Tilman Bostel; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Biologic and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Zachary S Bernstein; E Bridget Kim; Noopur Raje
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.666

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.