Literature DB >> 9495615

The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro.

T F Flemmig1, G J Petersilka, A Mehl, R Hickel, B Klaiber.   

Abstract

This study assessed defect depth and volume resulting from root instrumentation using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler with a slim scaling tip in vitro. Combinations of the following working parameters were analyzed: lateral forces of 0.5 N, 1 N, and 2 N; tip angulations of 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees; power settings of low, medium and high; and instrumentation time of 10 s, 20 s, 40 s, and 80 s. Defects were quantified using a 3D optical laser scanner. Overall, lateral force had the greatest influence on defect volume compared to instrument power setting and tip angulation (beta-weights 0.49 +/- 0.04, 0.25 +/- 0.04, and 0.14 +/- 0.04, respectively). The effects on defect depth were highest for tip angulation followed by lateral force and instrument power setting (beta-weights 0.48 +/- 0.04, 0.34 +/- 0.04, and 0.25 +/- 0.04, respectively). Interestingly, at all power settings, the highest defect volume and depth by far were found after combining 45 degrees tip angulation with 2 N of lateral force. The efficacy of the assessed piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler may be adapted to the various clinical needs by adjusting the lateral force, tip angulation, and power setting. To prevent severe root damage it is crucial to use the assessed scaler at a tip angulation of close to 0 degrees.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9495615     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02422.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of Root Surface Roughness Produced By Hand Instruments and Ultrasonic Scalers: An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Pawan Kumar; Swarga Jyoti Das; Saindhya Tora Sonowal; Jitendra Chawla
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal.

Authors:  Stefanie J Gartenmann; Thomas Thurnheer; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Treatment of residual pockets with photodynamic therapy, diode laser, or deep scaling. A randomized, split-mouth controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Isabelle Cappuyns; Norbert Cionca; Philipp Wick; Catherine Giannopoulou; Andrea Mombelli
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Subgingival instrumentation to remove simulated plaque in vitro: influence of operators' experience and type of instrument.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Falk Schwendicke; Anna Plaumann; Sebastian Rauschenbach; Claudia Springer; Maren Kahl; Sonja Sälzer; Christof E Dörfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings.

Authors:  Kathrin Lampe Bless; Beatrice Sener; Jürg Dual; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Clinical Efficacy of the 940-nm Diode Laser in the Treatment of Recurrent Pockets in the Periodontal Maintenance Phase.

Authors:  Zahra Alizadeh Tabari; Leila Pournasir; Sadegh Mohammadreza; Fahimeh Anbari
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-06

7.  A comparison of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling devices: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hojatollah Yousefimanesh; Maryam Robati; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Reza Molla
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets.

Authors:  Bahar Füsun Oduncuoğlu; Kıvanç Yamanel; Zahire Şahinoğlu Koçak
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-01

9.  Efficacy versus health risks: An in vitro evaluation of power-driven scalers.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Anna Plaumann; Jule Bielfeldt; Anica Tillner; Sonja Sälzer; Christof Edmund Dörfer
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

10.  A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Tobias T Hägi; Sabrina Klemensberger; Riccarda Bereiter; Sandor Nietzsche; Raluca Cosgarea; Simon Flury; Adrian Lussi; Anton Sculean; Sigrun Eick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.