Literature DB >> 9495354

No significant predictive value of c-erbB-2 or p53 expression regarding sensitivity to primary chemotherapy or radiotherapy in breast cancer.

S Rozan1, A Vincent-Salomon, B Zafrani, P Validire, P De Cremoux, A Bernoux, M Nieruchalski, A Fourquet, K Clough, V Dieras, P Pouillart, X Sastre-Garau.   

Abstract

To document whether c-erbB-2 over-expression or p53 accumulation in tumour cells was predictive of response to chemo- or radiotherapy, we analyzed a population of patients with breast cancer assigned to neo-adjuvant therapy (median follow-up: 54 months). T2/T3-N0N1b-M0 tumours (329 cases) were treated either by FAC chemotherapy or by radiotherapy before surgery, and the clinical response was classified as complete or incomplete. Expression of c-erbB-2 and p53 was retrospectively evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Proliferation rate was assessed by means of MIB-1 antibody and by S-phase fraction. A complete response to chemotherapy was observed in 38/167 patients (23%). Complete response rate was 20% in c-erbB-2-negative tumours, and rose to 31% in tumours with c-erbB-2 over-expression, but this trend was not statistically significant. There was no correlation between p53 staining and response to treatment, whereas chemosensitivity was found correlated with histological grade and S-phase. A complete response to radiotherapy was observed in 64 of the 156 evaluable patients (41%). Complete response rate was 41% in c-erbB-2- or p53-negative tumours, 54% in tumours with c-erb-B-2 over-expression, and 44% in tumours with p53 accumulation. There was no correlation between response to radiotherapy and histological grade or proliferative rate. No prognostic value was found for c-erbB-2 or p53 expression, whereas the 5-year survival rate was 85% for patients presenting a tumour with a low proliferating index (MIB-1 < 10%), and 68% for patients presenting a tumour with a high proliferative index. In multivariate analysis, node status (RR = 2), MIB-1 immunostaining (RR = 2), and tumour size (RR = 1.8) were found to be associated with survival. These results indicate that c-erbB-2 or p53 expression is not significantly associated with tumour response to neo-adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy in our series of breast cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9495354     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980220)79:1<27::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  22 in total

1.  Utility of DNA postreplication repair protein Rad6B in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Malathy P V Shekhar; Laura A Biernat; Nat Pernick; Larry Tait; Judith Abrams; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival.

Authors:  Lance D Miller; Johanna Smeds; Joshy George; Vinsensius B Vega; Liza Vergara; Alexander Ploner; Yudi Pawitan; Per Hall; Sigrid Klaar; Edison T Liu; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Deletion of p53 in human mammary epithelial cells causes chromosomal instability and altered therapeutic response.

Authors:  M B Weiss; M I Vitolo; M Mohseni; D M Rosen; S R Denmeade; B H Park; D J Weber; K E Bachman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 4.  Methods and goals for the use of in vitro and in vivo chemosensitivity testing.

Authors:  Rosalyn D Blumenthal; David M Goldenberg
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  p53 Expression in node-positive breast cancer patients: results from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344 Trial (159905).

Authors:  Jonathan F Lara; Ann D Thor; Lynn G Dressler; Gloria Broadwater; Ira J Bleiweiss; Susan Edgerton; David Cowan; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; James N Ingle; I Craig Henderson; Larry Norton; Eric P Winer; Clifford A Hudis; Matthew J Ellis; Donald A Berry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  The contribution of inherited factors to the clinicopathological features and behavior of breast cancer.

Authors:  W D Foulkes; J Rosenblatt; P O Chappuis
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 7.  TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines.

Authors:  Ashkan Shahbandi; Hoang D Nguyen; James G Jackson
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-02-05

8.  The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Veronique F Cocquyt; Vera R Schelfhout; Phillip N Blondeel; Herman T Depypere; Kristof K Daems; Rudolphe F Serreyn; Marleen M Praet; Simon J P Van Belle
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  A literature review of molecular markers predictive of clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ikuo Sekine; Chikako Shimizu; Kazuto Nishio; Nagahiro Saijo; Tomohide Tamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Impact of grade, hormone receptor, and HER-2 status in women with breast cancer on response to specific chemotherapeutic agents by in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay.

Authors:  Ja Seung Koo; Woohee Jung; Eunah Shin; Hy-de Lee; Joon Jeong; Kun-Hong Kim; Hyeongjae Jeong; Soon Won Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.