Literature DB >> 9494901

Surgical outcomes of cataract extractions performed by residents using phacoemulsification.

R P Corey1, R J Olson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether changes in surgical technique, resident training, and phacoemulsification equipment affected the complication rate for cataract extractions performed by residents.
SETTING: Combined urban and rural setting at a tertiary care academic center and a general care Veterans Administration Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 396 patients who had cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation performed by four residents. The residents' first 50 cases were compared with the last 50 cases performed at the end of their training. Surgical and 1 day postoperative complications were examined.
RESULTS: Twenty of 396 surgical cases (5.1%) involved complications, and the overall vitreous loss rate for the four residents was 1.8%. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two residents with the highest and lowest number of intraoperative complications (P < .05) and between the two residents with the highest and lowest number of 1 day postoperative complications (P < .05). The rate of posterior capsule rupture with vitreous loss was 2.6% in the residents' early cases; the decrease to no cases of posterior capsule rupture in the late cases was also statistically significant (P < .02).
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that with proper training and supervision, residents can obtain an acceptably low complication rate using phacoemulsification. As their skill increased, they were able to use phacoemulsification successfully on more complicated cases. Individual skill was also an important factor in the complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9494901     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80076-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  35 in total

1.  Complication rate and risk factors for intraoperative complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Briszi; Philipp Prahs; Jost Hillenkamp; Horst Helbig; Wolfgang Herrmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Visual outcomes after anterior vitrectomy: comparison of ECCE and phacoemulsification.

Authors:  J C Bobrow
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

3.  Validation of Najjar-Awwad cataract surgery risk score for resident phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  Preston H Blomquist; James W Sargent; Heather H Winslow
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Capsulorhexis: Pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Reza Erfanian; Nasser Karimi
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

5.  Increased intraocular pressure on the first postoperative day following resident-performed cataract surgery.

Authors:  J Y Kim; M-W Jo; S C Brauner; Z Ferrufino-Ponce; R Ali; S L Cremers; B An Henderson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Evaluation of the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Fatih Aslan; Berna Yuce; Zafer Oztas; Halil Ates
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Risk factors for vitreous complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  Preston H Blomquist; Marlene E Morales; Liyue Tong; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Comparison of two popular nuclear disassembly techniques for cataract surgeons in training: divide and conquer versus stop and chop.

Authors:  Michele Coppola; Alessandro Marchese; Alessandro Rabiolo; Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Karl Anders Knutsson
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Visual results and complications of temporal incision phacoemulsification performed with the non-dominant left hand by junior ophthalmologists.

Authors:  T Kageyama; S Yaguchi; Y Metori; M Chida; K Koizumi; T Onishi; M Ayaki
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Serious adverse events after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.