PURPOSE: To demonstrate the proper method for evaluating and reporting astigmatism for individual and aggregate data. SETTING: University of Texas Medical School and Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. METHODS: The surgically induced refractive change (SIRC) was determined for three data sets of patients who have had keratorefractive (photorefractive keratectomy) or cataract surgery. To make changes in refraction comparable, vertex distances for the refractions and keratometric index of refraction were considered. Doubledangle plots and single-angle plots were then used to display the data. Polar values (cylinder and axis) were converted to a Cartesian (x and y) coordinate system to determine the mean value of the induced astigmatism for each data set. RESULTS: Doubled-angle plots clearly demonstrated the trends of induced astigmatism for each data set, and the mean value for induced astigmatism agreed exactly with the intuitive appearance of the plot. CONCLUSIONS: Converting astigmatism data to a Cartesian coordinate system allowed the correct computation of descriptive statistics such as mean values, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients. Using doubled-angle plots to display the data provides the investigator with the best method of recognizing trends in the data.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the proper method for evaluating and reporting astigmatism for individual and aggregate data. SETTING: University of Texas Medical School and Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. METHODS: The surgically induced refractive change (SIRC) was determined for three data sets of patients who have had keratorefractive (photorefractive keratectomy) or cataract surgery. To make changes in refraction comparable, vertex distances for the refractions and keratometric index of refraction were considered. Doubledangle plots and single-angle plots were then used to display the data. Polar values (cylinder and axis) were converted to a Cartesian (x and y) coordinate system to determine the mean value of the induced astigmatism for each data set. RESULTS: Doubled-angle plots clearly demonstrated the trends of induced astigmatism for each data set, and the mean value for induced astigmatism agreed exactly with the intuitive appearance of the plot. CONCLUSIONS: Converting astigmatism data to a Cartesian coordinate system allowed the correct computation of descriptive statistics such as mean values, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients. Using doubled-angle plots to display the data provides the investigator with the best method of recognizing trends in the data.
Authors: Jean-Luc Febbraro; Li Wang; Edmondo Borasio; Lorenzo Richiardi; Hamza N Khan; Alain Saad; Damien Gatinel; Douglas D Koch Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jordana Sandes; Larissa R S Stival; Marcos Pereira de Ávila; Paulo Ferrara; Guilherme Ferrara; Leopoldo Magacho; Luana P N Araújo; Leonardo Torquetti Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Ruth E Manny; Li Deng; Jane Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Erik Weissberg; Mitchell Scheiman; Karen D Fern Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.973