Literature DB >> 9494489

Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.

L Liberman1, D D Dershaw, P P Rosen, E A Morris, A F Abramson, P I Borgen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether complete percutaneous removal of a malignant lesion detected at mammography ensures complete excision of the carcinoma histopathologically.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 135 lesions in which stereotactic biopsy was performed with a directional, vacuum biopsy instrument and an 11-gauge probe followed by mammography. Carcinoma was diagnosed at stereotactic biopsy in 51 (38%) lesions. In 15 (29%) carcinomas, the lesion seen at mammography was removed at stereotactic biopsy. Surgical findings were available for correlation with biopsy and imaging findings in all 15 cases. Mammographic and histopathologic findings were reviewed.
RESULTS: Mammographic findings were calcifications in 11 lesions and a mass in four lesions. The median lesion size was 0.7 cm (range, 0.2-1.4 cm), and the median number of biopsy specimens was 15 (range, 10-22 specimens). Histopathologic findings at stereotactic biopsy were ductal carcinoma in situ in 12 lesions and infiltrating ductal carcinoma in three. Surgery revealed residual carcinoma in 11 (73%) of 15 lesions, including all three infiltrating ductal carcinomas and eight of 12 ductal carcinoma in situ lesions.
CONCLUSION: Complete removal of the mammographic lesion does not ensure complete excision of the carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9494489     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

Review 1.  Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  T H Helbich; W Matzek; M H Fuchsjäger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.

Authors:  Viviana Londero; Chiara Zuiani; Anna Linda; Luisa Battigelli; Giovanni Brondani; Massimo Bazzocchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Predictive factors for invasive cancer in surgical specimens following an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in microcalcification-only lesions.

Authors:  Hatice Gümüş; Philippa Mills; David Fish; Metehan Gümüş; Karina Cox; Haresh Devalia; Sue Jones; Peter Jones; Ali R Sever
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Is zero underestimation feasible? Extended Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in solid lesions - a blind study.

Authors:  George C Zografos; Flora Zagouri; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Dimitra Koulocheri; Afroditi Nonni; Vassiliki Oikonomou; Philip Domeyer; Maria Kotsani; Constantine Fotiadis; John Bramis
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.