Literature DB >> 9493572

Replacing inpatient care by outpatient care in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis--an economic evaluation. TASMAN Study Group.

A G van den Belt1, P M Bossuyt, M H Prins, A S Gallus, H R Büller.   

Abstract

Two clinical trials in patients with acute deep venous thrombosis have indicated that the outpatient management with fixed-dose, subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin is at least as effective and safe as inpatient treatment with unfractionated intravenous heparin with respect to recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. We performed an economic evaluation alongside one of these trials to assess the cost consequences of the outpatient management strategy. Data were collected through case record forms, complemented by a prospective questionnaire in 78 consecutive patients, interviews with health care providers, and hospital data bases. Our study demonstrated that seventy-five percent of patients allocated to low-molecular-weight heparin received treatment either entirely at home or after a brief hospital stay. Fifteen percent of these patients required professional domiciliary care. Within-centre comparisons of resource utilisation in terms of natural units showed that outpatient management with low-molecular-weight heparin reduced the average number of hospital days in the initial treatment period in nine centres by 59 percent (95% CI: 43 to 71 percent) accompanied by a limited increase in outpatient and professional domiciliary care. The average reduction in hospital days at the end of follow up was 40 percent (95% CI: 25 to 54 percent). A cost-minimisation analysis, focusing on resource utilisation directly related to the treatment of deep venous thrombosis and associated costs in one centre demonstrated a cost reduction of 64 percent (95% CI: 56 to 72 percent) with the outpatient management with low-molecular-weight heparin. These data suggest that outpatient management of patients with proximal venous thrombosis using low-molecular-weight heparin reduces resource utilisation and total treatment cost. Implementation should be preceded by a cautious evaluation of a potential cost shifting and organisational prerequisites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9493572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  16 in total

Review 1.  Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Richard Othieno; Emmanuel Okpo; Rachel Forster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-09

2.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Lindsay Robertson; Lauren E Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-09

4.  Once-daily enoxaparin in the outpatient setting versus unfractionated heparin in hospital for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Beng H Chong; Tim A Brighton; Ross I Baker; Peter Thurlow; Choon H Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  C A Estrada; C J Mansfield; G R Heudebert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Safety and feasibility of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Authors:  Ji Seon Kim; Seong Hae Jeong; Dae Hyun Kim; Jei Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications.

Authors:  Judith A O'Brien; Jaime J Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; Denis Getsios; Ingrid Caro; Judith A O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin in treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  M Rodger; C Bredeson; P S Wells; J Beck; B Kearns; L B Huebsch
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Hospital versus home treatment of deep vein thrombosis in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: Are we ready?

Authors:  Farjah Algahtani; Zohair Al Aseri; Abdurahman Aldiab; Aamer Aleem
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.