Literature DB >> 9492673

Qualitative study of educational interaction between general practitioners and specialists.

M N Marshall1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the main barriers to effective educational interaction between general practitioners and specialists and to suggest ways of overcoming these barriers.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups. A content analysis of the data was performed.
SETTING: South and West Regional Health Authority.
SUBJECTS: 12 general practitioner principals and 12 hospital consultants were sampled purposefully and underwent a semistructured interview; a further 16 general practitioners and 16 hospital consultants similarly sampled made up four focus groups representing the two branches of the medical profession.
RESULTS: There was a mismatch between what the general practitioners wanted from specialists in educational terms, and what the specialists were providing. General practitioners wanted to learn information that was directly applicable to their clinical work and to use referrals as two way learning opportunities. They were not sufficiently explicit about their learning needs. Specialists preferred to concentrate on new developments in their subject and would benefit from learning different ways of teaching. The participants were willing to learn from each other. Three models of educational interaction were identified: traditional didactic lectures given by specialists to general practitioners, interactive clinically based teaching, and informal interaction based on referrals.
CONCLUSIONS: The two main branches of the medical profession have to address several significant problems before the full potential of teaching and learning together can be realised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9492673      PMCID: PMC2665624          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  15 in total

Review 1.  The objective assessment of general practitioners' educational needs: an under-researched area?

Authors:  P Myers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A framework for effective management of change in clinical practice: dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  N T Moulding; C A Silagy; D P Weller
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

3.  Reducing community dyspepsia drug costs: a controlled trial.

Authors:  R M Valori; C M Brown; P Strangeways; M Bradburn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Perspectives of specialists and family physicians in interprofessional teams in caring for patients with multimorbidity: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pauline Boeckxstaens; Judith Belle Brown; Sonja M Reichert; Christopher N C Smith; Moira Stewart; Martin Fortin
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-04-06

5.  Efficacy of case method learning in general practice for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Anna Kiessling; Peter Henriksson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-19

6.  How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; Annegriet Kuiken; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Theo B Voorn; Jan Schuling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Walsh; James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon; Lindy Masya
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Does GPs' self-perception of their professional role correspond to their social self-image?--a qualitative study from Germany.

Authors:  Iris Natanzon; Dominik Ose; Joachim Szecsenyi; Stephen Campbell; Marco Roos; Stefanie Joos
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; Wim H G M Benneker; Jan Schuling; Nienke Rijkers-Koorn; Joris P J Slaets; Betty Meyboom-de Jong
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Niek S Klazinga; Jan Schuling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.