Literature DB >> 32253205

Perspectives of specialists and family physicians in interprofessional teams in caring for patients with multimorbidity: a qualitative study.

Pauline Boeckxstaens1, Judith Belle Brown2, Sonja M Reichert2, Christopher N C Smith2, Moira Stewart2, Martin Fortin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with multimorbidity often require services across different health care settings, yet team processes among settings are rarely implemented. We explored perceptions of specialists and family physicians collaborating in a telemedicine interprofessional consultation for patients with multimorbidity to better understand the value of bringing physicians together across the boundaries of health care settings.
METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative, interview-based study. Physicians who had previously participated in the Telemedicine Interprofessional Model of Practice for Aging and Complex Treatments (Telemedicine IMPACT Plus [TIP] Program) were invited to participate and asked to describe their experience of being a member of the program. Interviews were conducted from March to May 2016. We conducted an iterative and interpretive process using both individual and team analysis to identify themes.
RESULTS: There were 15 participants, 9 specialists and 6 family physicians. Three themes emerged in the analysis: creating new perspectives on care for patients with multimorbidity by sharing knowledge, skills and attitudes; the shift from a consultant model to an interprofessional team model (allowing a window into the community, extending discussions beyond the medical model and focusing on the patient's health in context); and opportunities for learners, including learning about interprofessional collaboration and gaining exposure to a real-world model for caring for people with multimorbidity in outpatient settings.
INTERPRETATION: Family physicians and specialists participating in a TIP Program believed the program improved their knowledge and skills, while also serving as an effective care delivery strategy. The findings also support that learners require more exposure to nontraditional consultant models in order to care for patients with multimorbidity effectively. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32253205      PMCID: PMC7144580          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  36 in total

1.  Some benefits experienced by hospice nurses from group clinical supervision.

Authors:  A Jones
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Positive experiences with a specialist as facilitator in general practice.

Authors:  Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard; Thorkil Thorsen
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.240

3.  Qualitative study of educational interaction between general practitioners and specialists.

Authors:  M N Marshall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-07

4.  There is no "i" in teamwork in the patient-centered medical home: defining teamwork competencies for academic practice.

Authors:  Emily L Leasure; Ronald R Jones; Lauren B Meade; Marla I Sanger; Kris G Thomas; Virginia P Tilden; Judith L Bowen; Eric J Warm
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Determinants and impact of generalist-specialist communication about pediatric outpatient referrals.

Authors:  Christopher J Stille; Thomas J McLaughlin; William A Primack; Kathleen M Mazor; Richard C Wasserman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Factors supporting good partnership working between generalist and specialist palliative care services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clare Gardiner; Merryn Gott; Christine Ingleton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Lesly A Dossett; Janella N Hudson; Arden M Morris; M Catherine Lee; Richard G Roetzheim; Michael D Fetters; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in low-acuity settings: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Sandrijn M van Schaik; Bridget C O'Brien; Sandra A Almeida; Shelley R Adler
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  The relationship between GPs and hospital consultants and the implications for patient care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rod Sampson; Rosaline Barbour; Philip Wilson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Developing interprofessional care plans in chronic care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jerôme Jean Jacques van Dongen; Marloes Amantia van Bokhoven; Ramon Daniëls; Trudy van der Weijden; Wencke Wilhelmina Gerarda Petronella Emonts; Anna Beurskens
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.