Literature DB >> 9491583

Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment.

J Shah1, E T Higgins, R S Friedman.   

Abstract

Study 1 demonstrated that as individuals' promotion-related ideal strength increases, performance on an anagram task is greater for a monetary task incentive framed in terms of gains and nongains (i.e., promotion framed) than one framed in terms of losses and nonlosses (i.e., prevention framed), whereas the reverse is true as individuals' prevention-related ought strength increases. Study 2 further demonstrated that with promotion-framed task incentives, individuals' ideal' strength increases motivation for promotion-related goal attainment means (gaining points), whereas with prevention-framed task incentives, individuals' ought strength increases motivation for prevention-related means (avoiding losing points). These results suggest that motivation and performance are greater when the regulatory focus of task incentives and means match (vs. mismatch) the chronic regulatory focus of the performers.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9491583     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.2.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  51 in total

1.  Regulatory Focus and Anxiety: A Self-Regulatory Model of GAD-Depression Comorbidity.

Authors:  Megan M Klenk; Timothy J Strauman; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2011-05-01

2.  A test of the regulatory fit hypothesis in perceptual classification learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Grant C Baldwin; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

3.  Assessment of Individual Differences in Regulatory Focus among Cigarette Smokers.

Authors:  David A F Haaga; Dara G Friedman-Wheeler; Elizabeth McIntosh; Anthony H Ahrens
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2008

4.  A Field Experiment Testing the Utility of Regulatory Fit Messages for Promoting Physical Activity.

Authors:  Amy E Latimer; Susan E Rivers; Tara A Rench; Nicole A Katulak; Althea Hicks; Julie Keany Hodorowski; E Tory Higgins; Peter Salovey
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

Review 5.  The functional theory of counterfactual thinking.

Authors:  Kai Epstude; Neal J Roese
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-05

6.  The optimal level of fuzz: Case studies in a methodology for psychological research.

Authors:  Arthur B Markman; Jennifer S Beer; Lisa R Grimm; Jonathan R Rein; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Theor Artif Intell       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.340

7.  Motivated comprehension regulation: vigilant versus eager metacognitive control.

Authors:  David B Miele; Daniel C Molden; Wendi L Gardner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

8.  Stereotype Fit Effects for Golf Putting Nonexperts.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Benjamin Lewis; W Todd Maddox; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Sport Exerc Perform Psychol       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 9.  An Examination of Age-Based Stereotype Threat About Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01

10.  What Remains on Your Mind After You Are Done?: Flexible Regulation of Knowledge Accessibility.

Authors:  Per H Hedberg; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.