Literature DB >> 9489902

One-week omeprazole treatment in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

F Johnsson1, L Weywadt, J H Solhaug, H Hernqvist, L Bengtsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux are common, and currently available methods for diagnosing reflux disease are expensive and uncomfortable for the patient. The diagnostic value of a treatment test with omeprazole is unclear.
METHODS: Patients with dyspepsia including heartburn admitted for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blind Scandinavian multicentre study. Before entry 188 patients were enrolled, and 160 were randomized to 1-week treatment with 20 mg omeprazole twice daily or placebo. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was defined as reflux oesophagitis Savary-Miller grades II-III at endoscopy or pH < 4 exceeding 4% of the total time at 24-h oesophageal pH-monitoring and was found in 135 patients. The treatment test was considered positive when the patient's symptoms improved during the treatment week compared with the pretreatment day.
RESULTS: The sensitivity in diagnosing reflux disease was 71-81% with omeprazole as a diagnostic test, compared with 36-47% for placebo during treatment days 3-7. The specificity was similar for the two treatment arms during the first days of the study. During the end of the week a larger proportion of the patients with normal endoscopy and pH test responded to omeprazole treatment, giving omeprazole lower specificity than placebo. The investigators' overall evaluation of whether the patient was a responder to the test had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 55% in the omeprazole-treated patients. The corresponding figures in the placebo group were 17% and 92%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: One week of omeprazole treatment is a simple diagnostic test with a fairly high sensitivity. The specificity is poor owing to the placebo effect and to the lack of a gold standard in diagnosing reflux disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9489902     DOI: 10.1080/00365529850166149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  29 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Lump or split dyspepsia? A continuing controversy.

Authors:  N J Talley; S Thitiphuree
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain.

Authors:  R Fass; G Tougas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Endoscopy-negative reflux disease.

Authors:  J P Galmiche; S B des Varannes
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-06

Review 5.  Assessment of reflux symptom severity: methodological options and their attributes.

Authors:  P Bytzer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  [Correct diagnosis for indication in gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; Ch Gutschow; P Malfertheiner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Rabeprazole test for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: results of a study in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Sylvie Sacher-Huvelin; Fabienne Vavasseur; Claude Masliah; Marc Le Rhun; Philippe Aygalenq; Sylvie Bonnot-Marlier; Yves Lequeux; Jean Paul Galmiche
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Functional heartburn.

Authors:  Ram Dickman; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

9.  Functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and reflux esophagitis are all distinct conditions--a debate: pro.

Authors:  Tomás Navarro-Rodriguez; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08

Review 10.  Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs.

Authors:  J Dent; D Armstrong; B Delaney; P Moayyedi; N J Talley; N Vakil
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.