Literature DB >> 9486580

Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma: the impact of margin status.

M L Blute1, D G Bostwick, T M Seay, S K Martin, J M Slezak, E J Bergstralh, H Zincke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A proposed pathologic (pTNM) classification system for prostate carcinoma was analyzed for its impact on survival outcome in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era. The impact of margin status on the survival outcome of patients with otherwise organ-confined disease (i.e., without extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle involvement) was assessed.
METHODS: Among 5467 patients, the original pathologic classification was T2 in 2094 patients; those with evidence of positive margins, extraprostatic extension, or seminal vesicle involvement were initially classified as having pT3 disease (2920 patients) or pT4 residual disease (211 patients). According to the proposed pTNM system, 1512 patients for whom margin status was considered independent of T classification were reclassified.
RESULTS: After reclassification, 803 specimens had been down-classified to pT2, resulting in 2932 (54%) with pT2N0 organ-confined disease and a margin positivity rate of 27%; originally, only 38% of patients had been classified as pT2N0. When the old and new classifications were compared, 5-year progression free survival to the combined endpoint of clinical and/or PSA progression (< or = 0.2 ng/mL) was 86% versus 84% and 70% versus 67% for disease classified as pT2N0 and pT3N0, respectively. Multivariate analysis assessed the effect of margin status on 2334 pT2N0 patients (classified according to the proposed pTNM system) who did not receive adjuvant therapy; adjustments were made for Gleason grade, preoperative PSA, and DNA ploidy. In this analysis, the relative risk (with 95% confidence interval) associated with positive margins was 1.65 (1.24-2.18); this was significant for the combined endpoint of clinical/PSA progression. The 5-year survival, free of clinical/PSA progression, was 86% for those without versus 75% for those with positive margins.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports the adoption of the proposed pTNM system, which will allow for uniform reporting of pathologic data on prostate carcinoma. For patients with organ-confined disease, positive margins are associated with higher rates of PSA progression. Accordingly, patients should be stratified based on margin positivity in addition to pT classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9486580     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980301)82:5<902::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Organ-limited prostate cancer with positive resection margins. Importance of adjuvant radiation therapy].

Authors:  D Porres; D Pfister; B Brehmer; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Factors determining biochemical recurrence in low-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sıtkı Ün; Hakan Türk; Osman Koca; Rauf Taner Divrik; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

3.  The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence.

Authors:  R E Emerson; M O Koch; T D Jones; J K Daggy; B E Juliar; L Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Selenium, nickel, and calcium levels in cancerous and non-cancerous prostate tissue samples and their relation with some parameters.

Authors:  İlker Çelen; Talha Müezzinoğlu; O Yavuz Ataman; Sezgin Bakırdere; Mehmet Korkmaz; Nalan Neşe; Feriye Şenol; Murat Lekili
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  De novo expression of CD44 in prostate carcinoma is correlated with systemic dissemination of prostate cancer.

Authors:  V Paradis; P Eschwège; S Loric; F Dumas; N Ba; G Benoît; A Jardin; P Bedossa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Ozgür; F F Onol; L N Türkeri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Prostate cancer management: (1) an update on localised disease.

Authors:  S R J Bott; A J Birtle; C J Taylor; R S Kirby
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  The role of endorectal coil MRI in preoperative staging and decision-making for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Karim Touijer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jagdeesh N Kulkarni; Dayal Partap Singh; Shweta Bansal; Manisha Makkar; Rohan Valsangkar; Avinash T Siddaiah; Pushkar Sham Choudhary
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-07

10.  Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Diederik M Somford; Inge M van Oort; Jean-Pierre Cosyns; J Alfred Witjes; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Bertrand Tombal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.