Literature DB >> 9484637

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration: clinicopathologic features of 60 patients.

J S Bentz1, M L Kochman, D O Faigel, G G Ginsberg, D B Smith, P K Gupta.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent structures is possible using an imaging modality, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a suitable and cost-effective technique for obtaining cytohistologic material to confirm the diagnosis. EUS is capable of both characterizing the lesion and then guiding the FNA under real-time (RT) ultrasound guidance using a through-the-scope needle aspiration system. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of this technique and to describe the clinicopathologic features. Sixty patients underwent EUS-guided RTFNA of 64 lesions, including pancreas (n = 45), periluminal lymph nodes (n = 12), mediastinal and retroperitoneal masses (n = 4), and hepatobiliary masses (n = 3). Follow-up data were obtained by surgery, histopathology, or clinical course. Thirty-one lesions were malignant, eight were atypical/suspicious, 16 were non-neoplastic, and nine were non-diagnostic. Of the 55 lesions with sufficient material for interpretation, 54 had follow-up confirmation of the RTFNA diagnosis. The calculated sensitivity and specificity for malignancy was 90% and 100%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was excellent for gastrointestinal associated lymph nodes (100%), mediastinal and retroperitoneal masses (100%), somewhat less so for pancreatic tumors (94%), and poor for hepatobiliary lesions (33%). EUS-guided RTFNA is accurate for sampling small gastrointestinal tract-associated lesions. EUS-guided RTFNA should be considered as a procedure of choice in selected patients when the results will influence management decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9484637     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(199802)18:2<98::aid-dc4>3.0.co;2-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  15 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of non-pancreatic lesions: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Dipti Anand; Julieta E Barroeta; Prabodh K Gupta; Michael Kochman; Zubair W Baloch
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: where we stand in 2013?

Authors:  Zeid Karadsheh; Mohammad Al-Haddad
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Diagnostic potency of EUS-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh; Shabnam Shahrokh; Mohammad Hadizadeh; Maryam Padashi; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

4.  Retroperitoneal germ cell tumor diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  Craig M Womeldorph; Mark M Zalupski; Stewart M Knoepp; Mohammad Soltani; B Joseph Elmunzer
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-12-15

Review 5.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

6.  Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy?

Authors:  Fahad Alsohaibani; Safwat Girgis; Gurpal Singh Sandha
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles.

Authors:  Hiroo Imazu; Yujiro Uchiyama; Hiroshi Kakutani; Kei-Ichi Ikeda; Kazuki Sumiyama; Mitsuru Kaise; Salem Omar; Tiing Leong Ang; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Hébert-Magee; S Bae; S Varadarajulu; J Ramesh; A R Frost; M A Eloubeidi; I A Eltoum
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.073

9.  Prospective evaluation of ultrasound and colour duplex imaging for the assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  Robert Grützmann; Alfred Bunk; Stephan Kersting; Christian Pilarsky; Frank Dobrowolski; Eberhard Kuhlisch; Detlef Ockert; Hans Detlev Saeger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Accurately Diagnoses Smaller Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Compared To Computer Tomography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration.

Authors:  Jeremy Wang; Jihane N Benhammou; Kevin Ghassemi; Stephen Kim; Alireza Sedarat; James Farrell; Joseph R Pisegna
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Pancreatol Liver Disord       Date:  2017-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.