Literature DB >> 9482824

Genome projects and gene pools: new germplasm for plant breeding?

M Lee1.   

Abstract

Crop gene pools have adapted to and sustained the demands of agricultural systems for thousands of years. Yet, very little is known about their content, distribution, architecture, or circuitry. The presumably shallow elite gene pools often continue to yield genetic gains while the exotic pools remain mostly untapped, uncharacterized, and underutilized. The concept and content of a crop's gene pools are being changed by advancements in plant science and technology. In the first generation of plant genomics, DNA markers have refined some perceptions of genetic variation by providing a glimpse of a primary source, DNA polymorphism. The markers have provided new and more powerful ways of assessing genetic relationships, diversity, and merit by infusing genetic information for the first time in many scenarios or in a more comprehensive manner for others. As a result, crop gene pools may be supplemented through more rapid and directed methods from a greater variety of sources. Previously limited by the barriers of sexual reproduction, the native gene pools will soon be complemented by another gene pool (transgenes) and perhaps by other native exotic gene pools through comparative analyses of plants' biological repertoire. Plant genomics will be an important force of change for crop improvement. The plant science community and crop gene pools may be united and enriched as never before. Also, the genomes and gene pools, the products of evolution and crop domestication, will be reduced and subjected to the vagaries and potential divisiveness of intellectual property considerations. Let the gains begin.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9482824      PMCID: PMC33832          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic Loci.

Authors:  A H Paterson; Y R Lin; Z Li; K F Schertz; J F Doebley; S R Pinson; S C Liu; J W Stansel; J E Irvine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; J C Nelson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Identification of genomic regions affecting plant height in sorghum and maize.

Authors:  M G Pereira; M Lee
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Accessing genetic information with high-density DNA arrays.

Authors:  M Chee; R Yang; E Hubbell; A Berno; X C Huang; D Stern; J Winkler; D J Lockhart; M S Morris; S P Fodor
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Molecular genetics of plant disease resistance.

Authors:  B J Staskawicz; F M Ausubel; B J Baker; J G Ellis; J D Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Genetic diagnostics in plant breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines.

Authors:  J A Rafalski; S V Tingey
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross.

Authors:  M C deVicente; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around the Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding.

Authors:  N D Young; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Comparative recombination distances among Zea mays L. inbreds, wide crosses and interspecific hybrids.

Authors:  C G Williams; M M Goodman; C W Stuber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; S Grandillo; T M Fulton; D Zamir; Y Eshed; V Petiard; J Lopez; T Beck-Bunn
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.699

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Sorghum bicolor's transcriptome response to dehydration, high salinity and ABA.

Authors:  Christina D Buchanan; Sanghyun Lim; Ron A Salzman; Ioannis Kagiampakis; Daryl T Morishige; Brock D Weers; Robert R Klein; Lee H Pratt; Marie-Michèle Cordonnier-Pratt; Patricia E Klein; John E Mullet
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 2.  Regulating the regulators: the future prospects for transcription-factor-based agricultural biotechnology products.

Authors:  Karen Century; T Lynne Reuber; Oliver J Ratcliffe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding.

Authors:  Amit Gur; Dani Zamir
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Diversity in global gene expression and morphology across a watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.) germplasm collection: first steps to breeding.

Authors:  Adrienne C Payne; Graham J J Clarkson; Steve Rothwell; Gail Taylor
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.793

5.  Analysis of genetic differentiation and genomic variation to reveal potential regions of importance during maize improvement.

Authors:  Xun Wu; Yongxiang Li; Xin Li; Chunhui Li; Yunsu Shi; Yanchun Song; Zuping Zheng; Yu Li; Tianyu Wang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.215

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.