S Holme1, G Moroff, S Murphy. 1. American Red Cross Blood Services, Mid-Atlantic Region, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the use of specific in vitro tests for the assessment of the quality of platelet components. A literature review found that the platelet discoid shape as measured photometrically by the extent of shape change (ESC) and hypotonic shock response (HSR) correlated well with in vivo viability. The purpose of this study was to determine whether multiple research laboratories can perform the ESC and HSR assays in an accurate, reproducible manner, with acceptable sensitivity and comparable results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven laboratories conducted five identical experiments, each with a different unit of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). For each experiment, 2 half-units of PRP were prepared and stored overnight: 1 half-unit at 20 to 24 degrees C in CPD (CPD-PRP) and the other at 1 to 6 degrees C with 2 mg per mL of EDTA (cold EDTA-PRP) added to produce spherical platelets with reduced HSR. Platelet suspensions having different proportions of the two PRPs were prepared and evaluated in duplicate by ESC and HSR assays, and morphologically scored by microscopy. One-way ANOVA and Duncan multiple-range tests were performed to determine significant differences in assay results for suspensions having different proportions of CPD-PRP. RESULTS: Comparable ESC (mean range: 20-28% for CPD-PRP and 1-6% for cold EDTA-PRP) and HSR (mean range: 58-81% for CPD-PRP and 12-31% for cold EDTA-PRP) measurements were obtained by nine laboratories. Duplicate testing showed high reproducibility of ESR and HSR results /in all laboratories. A 25-percent difference in the proportion of CPD-PRP (indicative of a difference of approximately 25% in the proportions of discoid and spherical platelets) was detected with a sample size of five (p<0.05) for both the ESC and HSR assays. A high correlation was found for the ESC assay and morphology score (r = 0.93, n = 345). CONCLUSION: Multiple laboratories were able to obtain comparable results with the ESC and HSR tests. They were able to show that the tests can be performed in an accurate, reproducible manner and with acceptable sensitivity.
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the use of specific in vitro tests for the assessment of the quality of platelet components. A literature review found that the platelet discoid shape as measured photometrically by the extent of shape change (ESC) and hypotonic shock response (HSR) correlated well with in vivo viability. The purpose of this study was to determine whether multiple research laboratories can perform the ESC and HSR assays in an accurate, reproducible manner, with acceptable sensitivity and comparable results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven laboratories conducted five identical experiments, each with a different unit of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). For each experiment, 2 half-units of PRP were prepared and stored overnight: 1 half-unit at 20 to 24 degrees C in CPD (CPD-PRP) and the other at 1 to 6 degrees C with 2 mg per mL of EDTA (cold EDTA-PRP) added to produce spherical platelets with reduced HSR. Platelet suspensions having different proportions of the two PRPs were prepared and evaluated in duplicate by ESC and HSR assays, and morphologically scored by microscopy. One-way ANOVA and Duncan multiple-range tests were performed to determine significant differences in assay results for suspensions having different proportions of CPD-PRP. RESULTS: Comparable ESC (mean range: 20-28% for CPD-PRP and 1-6% for cold EDTA-PRP) and HSR (mean range: 58-81% for CPD-PRP and 12-31% for cold EDTA-PRP) measurements were obtained by nine laboratories. Duplicate testing showed high reproducibility of ESR and HSR results /in all laboratories. A 25-percent difference in the proportion of CPD-PRP (indicative of a difference of approximately 25% in the proportions of discoid and spherical platelets) was detected with a sample size of five (p<0.05) for both the ESC and HSR assays. A high correlation was found for the ESC assay and morphology score (r = 0.93, n = 345). CONCLUSION: Multiple laboratories were able to obtain comparable results with the ESC and HSR tests. They were able to show that the tests can be performed in an accurate, reproducible manner and with acceptable sensitivity.
Authors: Eva María Plaza; María Luisa Lozano; Isabel Sánchez Guiu; José Manuel Egea; Vicente Vicente; Laura Collantes De Terán; José Rivera Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Peter Schubert; Jonathan N Thon; Geraldine M Walsh; Cindy H I Chen; Edwin D Moore; Dana V Devine; Juergen Kast Journal: Transfusion Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ji Won Park; Barbora Piknova; James Kurtz; Shalini Seetharaman; Stephen J Wagner; Alan N Schechter Journal: Transfusion Date: 2012-07-15 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Lacey Johnson; Ryan Hyland; Shereen Tan; Frank Tolksdorf; Chryslain Sumian; Axel Seltsam; Denese Marks Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 3.747