Literature DB >> 9481029

Low-level lead exposure and behavior in early childhood.

A L Mendelsohn1, B P Dreyer, A H Fierman, C M Rosen, L A Legano, H A Kruger, S W Lim, C D Courtlandt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether small elevations in blood lead level were associated with measurable behavioral changes in a group of poor children between 1 and 3 years old.
METHODS: The study population consisted of children presenting for routine well-child care to the pediatric clinic at Bellevue Hospital Center, a large urban public hospital. The following inclusion criteria were used for entry into the study: age 12 to 36 months; capillary lead screening result <1.21 micromol/L (25 microg/dL); no known prior history either of blood lead level >1.21 micromol/L (25 microg/dL) or lead exposure requiring chelation therapy; Latino or African-American; English or Spanish spoken in the home; biological mother as primary caretaker; child not presently attending day care; full-term, singleton gestation; birth weight at least 2500 g; no known neurologic or developmental disorder; and no severe chronic disease, including human immunodeficiency virus infection. Study enrollment was simultaneously stratified by capillary lead level and age. All children between 12 and 36 months attending the pediatric clinic during the study period received screening capillary blood measures of lead level following the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics as part of routine primary care. During periods of enrollment, consecutive lead measurements performed in the pediatric clinic were reviewed by one of the researchers. For those children meeting entry criteria based on lead level and age, further eligibility based on the remainder of the inclusion criteria was determined through parental interview and review of the medical record. Lead exposure was assessed with a single capillary blood specimen, using atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Subjects were considered to be lead-exposed if their lead level was between 0.48 and 1.20 micromol/L (10 and 24.9 microg/dL) and nonexposed if their lead level was between 0 and 0.48 micromol/L (0 and 9.9 microg/dL). Behavior was assessed using the Behavior Rating Scale (BRS) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition. The BRS in this age group consists of three components: an Emotional Regulation Factor that measures hyperactive/distractible/easy-frustration behaviors; an Orientation-Engagement Factor that measures fear/withdrawal/disinterest behaviors; and a Motor Quality Factor that assesses the appropriateness of movement and tone. The BRS is scored as a percentile; lower scores reflect more problematic behaviors. Researchers performing the BRS were blinded to capillary lead results. Information was collected concerning factors that might confound the relationship between lead and behavior. Demographic factors were collected, including: child's age, gender, and country of origin; mother's age, marital status, parity, country of origin, and primary language spoken; parental education, and occupation and receipt of public assistance. Socioeconomic status was determined using the Hollingshead Two-Factor Index of Social Position. Maternal verbal IQ was assessed using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Maternal depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Cognitive stimulation provided in the home was assessed using a new office-based instrument, the StimQ, which measures the quantity and quality of play materials and parent-toddler activities in the child's home. To assess the child for iron deficiency, we performed a hematocrit and mean corpuscular volume at the time of the capillary lead evaluation. A presumptive diagnosis of iron deficiency was made if the child was either anemic (defined as a hematocrit <32) or had a mean corpuscular volume <72.
RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 72 children. Children in the lead-exposed group (n = 41) had a mean BRS behavior score that was 15.8 points lower than that of children in the nonexposed group (n = 31), which was significant by the Stu

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9481029     DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.3.e10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  22 in total

1.  Relationship between prenatal lead exposure and infant blood lead levels.

Authors:  Natalie P Archer; Carrie M Bradford; David M Klein; Jim Barnes; L J Smith; John F Villanacci
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-10

2.  Background lead and mercury exposures: Psychological and behavioral problems in children.

Authors:  Brooks B Gump; Matthew J Dykas; James A MacKenzie; Amy K Dumas; Bryce Hruska; Craig K Ewart; Patrick J Parsons; Christopher D Palmer; Kestutis Bendinskas
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 3.  Hershey Medical Center Technical Workshop Report: optimizing the design and interpretation of epidemiologic studies for assessing neurodevelopmental effects from in utero chemical exposure.

Authors:  Robert W Amler; Stanley Barone; Aysenil Belger; Cheston M Berlin; Christopher Cox; Harry Frank; Michael Goodman; Jean Harry; Stephen R Hooper; Roger Ladda; Judy S LaKind; Paul H Lipkin; Lewis P Lipsitt; Matthew N Lorber; Gary Myers; Ann M Mason; Larry L Needham; Babasaheb Sonawane; Theodore D Wachs; Janice W Yager
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Environmental lead exposure is associated with neurocognitive dysfunction in children with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Rebecca L Ruebner; Stephen R Hooper; Carisa Parrish; Susan L Furth; Jeffrey J Fadrowski
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Blood lead levels and neurodevelopmental function in perinatally HIV-exposed, uninfected children in a US-based longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine Tassiopoulos; Yanling Huo; Joseph Braun; Paige L Williams; Renee Smith; Ann Aschengrau; Sharon Nichols; Rohan Hazra; William A Meyer; Katherine Knapp; Nagamah S Deygoo; George R Seage Iii
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.205

6.  Blood lead concentrations and children's behavioral and emotional problems: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jianghong Liu; Xianchen Liu; Wei Wang; Linda McCauley; Jennifer Pinto-Martin; Yingjie Wang; Linda Li; Chonghuai Yan; Walter J Rogan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Lead burden and psychiatric symptoms and the modifying influence of the delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) polymorphism: the VA Normative Aging Study.

Authors:  Pradeep Rajan; Karl T Kelsey; Joel D Schwartz; David C Bellinger; Jennifer Weuve; David Sparrow; Avron Spiro; Thomas J Smith; Huiling Nie; Howard Hu; Robert O Wright
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Lead exposure and educational proficiency: moderate lead exposure and educational proficiency on end-of-grade examinations.

Authors:  Michael S Amato; Colleen F Moore; Sheryl Magzamen; Pamela Imm; Jeffrey A Havlena; Henry A Anderson; Marty S Kanarek
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  The relation of low-level prenatal lead exposure to behavioral indicators of attention in Inuit infants in Arctic Quebec.

Authors:  P Plusquellec; G Muckle; E Dewailly; P Ayotte; S W Jacobson; J L Jacobson
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 10.  Neurotoxic effects and biomarkers of lead exposure: a review.

Authors:  Talia Sanders; Yiming Liu; Virginia Buchner; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.