Literature DB >> 9480958

Modeling developmental changes in strength and aerobic power in children.

A M Nevill1, R L Holder, A Baxter-Jones, J M Round, D A Jones.   

Abstract

The present study examined two contrasting multilevel model structures to describe the developmental (longitudinal) changes in strength and aerobic power in children: 1) an additive polynomial structure and 2) a multiplicative structure with allometric body size components. On the basis of the maximum log-likelihood criterion, the multiplicative "allometric" model was shown to be superior to the additive polynomial model when fitted to the data from two published longitudinal studies and to provide more plausible solutions within and beyond the range of observations. The multilevel regression analysis of study 1 confirmed that aerobic power develops approximately in proportion to body mass, m1/3. The analyses from study 2 identified a significant increase in quadriceps and biceps strength, in proportion to body size, plus an additional contribution from age, centered at about peak height velocity (PHV). The positive "age" term for boys suggested that at PHV the boys were becoming stronger in the quadriceps and biceps in relation to their body size. In contrast, the girls' age term was either negligible (quadriceps) or negative (biceps), indicating that at PHV the girls' strength was developing in proportion to or, in the case of the biceps, was becoming weaker in relation to their body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9480958     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.3.963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  24 in total

1.  Short term power output in relation to growth and maturation.

Authors:  N Armstrong; J R Welsman; M Y Chia
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Assessment and interpretation of isokinetic muscle strength during growth and maturation.

Authors:  Mark De Ste Croix; Martine Deighan; Neil Armstrong
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Muscle strength testing: use of normalisation for body size.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests.

Authors:  Goran Markovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Allometric scaling of strength measurements to body size.

Authors:  J P Folland; T M Mc Cauley; A G Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Longitudinal study of repeated sprint performance in youth soccer players of contrasting skeletal maturity status.

Authors:  João Valente-Dos-Santos; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva; Vítor Severino; João Duarte; Raúl S Martins; António J Figueiredo; André T Seabra; Renaat M Philippaerts; Sean P Cumming; Marije Elferink-Gemser; Robert M Malina
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Reference Values in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.

Authors:  Samuel Blais; Jade Berbari; Francois-Pierre Counil; Frederic Dallaire
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 8.  Expression of VO2peak in Children and Youth, with Special Reference to Allometric Scaling.

Authors:  Mark Loftin; Melinda Sothern; Takashi Abe; Marc Bonis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Muscle strength and contractile kinetics of isometric elbow flexion in girls and women.

Authors:  Bareket Falk; Laura Brunton; Raffy Dotan; Charlotte Usselman; Panagiota Klentrou; Davie Gabriel
Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.333

Review 10.  Trainability of young athletes and overtraining.

Authors:  Nuno Matos; Richard J Winsley
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.