Literature DB >> 12141882

Muscle strength testing: use of normalisation for body size.

Slobodan Jaric1.   

Abstract

Assessment of muscle strength tests has been a popular form of testing muscle function in sports and exercises, as well as in other movement-related sciences for several decades. Although the relationship between muscle strength and body size has attracted considerable attention from researchers, this relationship has been often either neglected or incorrectly taken into account when presenting the results from muscle strength tests. Two specific problems have been identified. First, most of the studies have presented strength data either non-normalised for body size, or normalised using inappropriate methods, or even several different normalisations have been applied on the same sets of data. Second, the role of body size in various movement performances has been neglected when functional movement performance was assessed by muscle strength. As a consequence, muscle function, athletic profiles, or functional movement performance assessed by tested muscle strength have been often confounded by the effect of body size. Differences in the normalisation methods applied also do not allow for comparison of the data obtained in different studies. Using the following allometric formula for obtaining index of muscle strength, S, independent of body size (assessed by body mass, m) should be recommended in routine strength testing procedures: The allometric parameter should be either b = 0.67 for muscle force (recorded by a dynamometer), or b = 1 for muscle torque (recorded by an isokinetic apparatus). We also recommend using body-size-independent indices of both muscle strength and movement performance when assessing functional performance from recorded muscle strength or vice versa.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141882     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200232100-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  87 in total

1.  Allometric scaling of isokinetic peak torque: the Nebraska Wrestling Study.

Authors:  J P Weir; T J Housh; G O Johnson; D J Housh; K T Ebersole
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Relationship between strength qualities and performance in standing and run-up vertical jumps.

Authors:  W Young; G Wilson; C Byrne
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Effects of box weight, vertical location and symmetry on lifting capacities and ratings on category scale in Japanese female workers.

Authors:  Y Hattori; Y Ono; M Shimaoka; S Hiruta; E Shibata; S Ando; F Hori; Y Takeuchi
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures. Differences and similarities between low-back-injured and noninjured workers.

Authors:  P J Mandell; E Weitz; J I Bernstein; M H Lipton; J Morris; D Bradshaw; K P Bodkin; B Mattmiller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Isokinetic knee extensor strength and functional performance in healthy female soccer players.

Authors:  A Ostenberg; E Roos; C Ekdahl; H Roos
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 6.  The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment.

Authors:  G J Wilson; A J Murphy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Motor performance in different dynamic tests in knee rehabilitation.

Authors:  K Pfeifer; W Banzer
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Value of resistance training for the reduction of sports injuries.

Authors:  S J Fleck; J E Falkel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Standard anaerobic exercise tests.

Authors:  H Vandewalle; G Pérès; H Monod
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Do functional tests predict low back pain?

Authors:  E P Takala; E Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  96 in total

1.  Muscle strength testing: evaluation of tests of explosive force production.

Authors:  Dragan M Mirkov; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Sladjan Milanovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Assessment and interpretation of isokinetic muscle strength during growth and maturation.

Authors:  Mark De Ste Croix; Martine Deighan; Neil Armstrong
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests.

Authors:  Goran Markovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Two-Year Longitudinal Changes in Lower Limb Strength and Its Relation to Loss in Function in a Large Cohort of Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Abhinandan Batra; Ann Harrington; Donovan J Lott; Rebecca Willcocks; Claudia R Senesac; William McGehee; Dandan Xu; Sunita Mathur; Michael J Daniels; William D Rooney; Sean C Forbes; William Triplett; Jasjit K Deol; Ishu Arpan; Roxanne Bendixen; Richard Finkel; Erika Finanger; Gihan Tennekoon; Barry Byrne; Barry Russman; H Lee Sweeney; Glenn Walter; Krista Vandenborne
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  An evaluation of differences in hip external rotation strength and range of motion between female dancers and non-dancers.

Authors:  A Gupta; B Fernihough; G Bailey; P Bombeck; A Clarke; D Hopper
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Scaling of muscle power to body size: the effect of stretch-shortening cycle.

Authors:  Goran Markovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-09       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Obesity and knee osteoarthritis are not associated with impaired quadriceps specific strength in adults.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; M Bridget Zimmerman; Morgan Brubaker; James C Torner
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Body size and countermovement depth confound relationship between muscle power output and jumping performance.

Authors:  Srdjan Markovic; Dragan M Mirkov; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Force-velocity relationship of leg extensors obtained from loaded and unloaded vertical jumps.

Authors:  Ivan Cuk; Milos Markovic; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Dusan Ugarkovic; Milos Kukolj; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Muscle mass is more strongly related to hip bone mineral density than is quadriceps strength or lower activity level in adults over age 50 year.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; James C Torner; Mei Yang; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Felson; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.