Literature DB >> 9479767

The recognition of vowels produced by men, women, boys, and girls by cochlear implant patients using a six-channel CIS processor.

P C Loizou1, M F Dorman, V Powell.   

Abstract

Five patients who used a six-channel, continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) cochlear implant were presented vowels, in two experiments, from a large sample of men, women, boys, and girls for identification. At issue in the first experiment was whether vowels from one speaker group, i.e., men, were more identifiable than vowels from other speaker groups. At issue in the second experiment was the role of the fifth and sixth channels in the identification of vowels from the different speaker groups. It was found in experiment 1 that (i) the vowels produced by men were easier to identify than vowels produced by any of the other speaker groups, (ii) vowels from women and boys were more difficult to identify than vowels from men but less difficult than vowels from girls, and (iii) vowels from girls were more difficult to identify than vowels from all other groups. In experiment 2 removal of channels 5 and 6 from the processor impaired the identification of vowels produced by women, boys and girls but did not impair the identification of vowels produced by men. The results of experiment 1 demonstrate that scores on tests of vowels produced by men overestimate the ability of patients to recognize vowels in the broader context of multi-talker communication. The results of experiment 2 demonstrate that channels 5 and 6 become more important for vowel recognition as the second formants of the speakers increase in frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9479767     DOI: 10.1121/1.421248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  [Speaker discrimination in cochlear implant users].

Authors:  R Mühler; M Ziese; J L Verhey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

4.  Identification of Minimal Pairs of Japanese Pitch Accent in Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Yukiko Sugiyama
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Pranesh Bhargava; Etienne Gaudrain; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.