Literature DB >> 9479339

Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.

J W Bishop1, S H Bigner, T J Colgan, M Husain, L P Howell, K M McIntosh, D A Taylor, M H Sadeghi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of liquid-based cell preparations from the AutoCyte PREP system (AutoCyte, Inc., Elon College, North Carolina) with the conventional cervical smear in masked, split-sample, multisite trials. STUDY
DESIGN: The AutoCyte PREP system utilizes the CytoRich method, which combines liquid preservation, selective reduction of blood and inflammation, thin-layer cell dispersion and discrete staining. In an eight-site multicenter trial, 8,983 cases were evaluated. Parallel AutoCyte PREP slides and matching conventional cervical cytologic smears were screened in a masked fashion, with all abnormals reviewed in a masked, on-site pathologist review. The conventional smear was always prepared first, with the AutoCyte PREP using the residual cells on the collection device. The Bethesda System was used for reporting diagnosis and specimen adequacy.
RESULTS: Of the cases, 7,805 (86.9%) had the same interpretation. In 8,750 cases (97.4%), there was agreement within one diagnostic category. The AutoCyte PREP demonstrated a statistically significant, 31% overall improvement in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesion and invasive cancer when evaluating cases with more than one diagnostic class difference. Biopsy correlation of available data supported the improvement observed in the cytology-based comparison. Recovery of infectious organisms and endocervical component was comparable between preparations, especially in light of the split-sample study design. There was a 39% reduction in unsatisfactory slides and 44% fewer satisfactory but limited by reports.
CONCLUSION: The AutoCyte PREP and CytoRich method produce excellent cellular presentations with standardized quality, superior sensitivity and improved adequacy as compared to the conventional method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9479339     DOI: 10.1159/000331545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Oral cytology: historical development, current status, and perspectives].

Authors:  M Hullmann; T E Reichert; R Dahse; F von Eggeling; H Pistner; H Kosmehl; O Driemel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

2.  Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Joël Coste; Béatrix Cochand-Priollet; Patricia de Cremoux; Catherine Le Galès; Isabelle Cartier; Vincent Molinié; Sylvain Labbé; Marie-Cécile Vacher-Lavenu; Philippe Vielh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

3.  Liquid-based versus conventional cytology of oral brush biopsies: a split-sample pilot study.

Authors:  T W Remmerbach; N Pomjanski; U Bauer; H Neumann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Value of centrifugated liquid-based cytology by Papanicolaou and May-Grünwald in oral epithelial cells.

Authors:  Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed; Ali Mahmmoud Edris; Eneel Ahmed Mohmed; Mohammed Omer M Hussein
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2009-07-22

5.  Clinical comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology of oral brush biopsies: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Constanze Olms; Nathalie Hix; Heinrich Neumann; Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Torsten W Remmerbach
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 6.  Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Anurag Gupta; Mamta Singh; Rahela Ibrahim
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Barriers to adoption of recent technology in cervical screening.

Authors:  Darshana Jhala; Isam Eltoum
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Combined use of urinary Survivin detection and liquid-based cytology for the early diagnosis of bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Xu; Ping Li; Dian Fu; Zhifeng Wei; Song Xu; Feng Xu; Feng Tian; Jingping Ge; Zhengyu Zhang; Wen Cheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.967

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.