Literature DB >> 9479074

Differences in visual search tasks between congenitally deaf and normally hearing adults.

P Stivalet1, Y Moreno, J Richard, P A Barraud, C Raphel.   

Abstract

In order to study the processes of central vision in deaf subjects, 12 congenitally deaf adults and 12 normally hearing adults performed a visual search task. The task consisted of detecting a "Q" target among "O" distractors in variable numbers and the reverse. The method used a paradigm based on the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) specifically designed to measure the visual processing time between the visual array and a mask. A different visual search pattern was observed in each group. The hearing subjects showed an asymmetrical visual search pattern (parallel versus serial processing respectively for "Q" and "O" targets). In contrast, the deaf subjects showed a symmetrical search pattern (parallel processing in both experimental conditions). In a visual task selectively supported by central vision, visual processes of the congenitally deaf are more efficient when the task involves the contribution of serial processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9479074     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(97)00026-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  13 in total

Review 1.  Do deaf individuals see better?

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Dara E Baril; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Superior spatial touch: improved haptic orientation processing in deaf individuals.

Authors:  Rick van Dijk; Astrid M L Kappers; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The integrated development of sensory organization.

Authors:  Robert Lickliter
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.430

5.  Deafness and visual enumeration: not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness.

Authors:  Peter C Hauser; Matthew W G Dye; Mrim Boutla; C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Eye gaze during observation of static faces in deaf people.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Tetsuya Matsuda; Tomoyuki Nishioka; Miki Namatame
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Changes in early cortical visual processing predict enhanced reactivity in deaf individuals.

Authors:  Davide Bottari; Anne Caclin; Marie-Hélène Giard; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual advantage in deaf adults linked to retinal changes.

Authors:  Charlotte Codina; Olivier Pascalis; Chris Mody; Peter Toomey; Jill Rose; Laura Gummer; David Buckley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Early deafness increases the face inversion effect but does not modulate the composite face effect.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Abeer Aljuhanay; Bruno Rossion; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25

10.  Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.